Mediterranean Diet Linked to Less Sudden Cardiac Death in Women

"Trust me. You don't want sudden cardiac death until you're very old!"

A Mediterranean-style diet is one of four factors helping to greatly reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in women, as reported by Reuters on June 5, 2011. The other factors reducing risk were maintainence of a healthy weight, regular exercise, and not smoking.

The study involved women only, so we don’t know if the research, reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association, applies to men.  I bet it does.

This study confirms many earlier ones linking the Mediterranean diet with longevity and reduced rates of heart disease.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Comments Off on Mediterranean Diet Linked to Less Sudden Cardiac Death in Women

Filed under coronary heart disease, Health Benefits, Mediterranean Diet

Introducing Paleo Diabetic, a New Blog

A few of my patients have asked me if the paleo diet and lifestyle would be good for their diabetes.  I’m not sure.  A few pilot studies suggest it would be.  I expect much more published scientific research over the coming decade, in addition to self-experimentation reports by patients.  I’ll be looking into the matter at Paleo Diabetic.

The paleo diet in modern times began gathering steam in 2008.  It’s still not widely known or followed, but the trend is definitely upwards. 

The idea behind the paleo diet—also referred to as the Stone Age or caveman diet—is that optimal health depends on adherence to dietary and lifestyle factors to which we’re genetically adapted.  Our current mix of genes overwhelmingly reflects the Paleolithic era of human cultural development, starting anywhere from 750,000 to 2.5 million years ago, and ending around 10,000 years ago.  It’s also called the Stone Age.

The paleo diet pattern isn’t set in stone.  In general, it includes nuts, vegetables, fruits, fish, meat, and poultry.  It excludes or limits grains, dairy, legumes, sugars other than fruit or honey, industrial seed oils (e.g., from soybean and corn), and modern processed, highly refined foods.  Fresh, natural, and “organic” are preferred.

I’ve already got a few posts up and plan on new ones once or twice weekly.  If you’re interested, please join me at Paleo Diabetic.

Steve Parker, M.D.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Is Grape Seed Extract as Healthful as Wine?

Patients ask me periodically if grape seed extract provides the same health benefit as judicious red wine.  Nobody knows with certainty.  The health benefits of red wine may be due to resveratrol.  Grape seed extract contains potentially healthy antioxidants called proanthocyanidins,

Many people don’t enjoy wine or other alcohol-containing drinks, and others just shouldn’t drink any alcohol.  Should they take a grape seed extract supplement or drink grape juice as a subsitute?  Again, it’s still unclear.  In 2009 I wrote a about a review article looking at the effect of various non-wine grape products and effects on heart disease risk.

A recent meta-analysis out of the University of Connecticut found improvement in two heart disease risk factors in those who take a grape seed extract supplement:

  • systolic blood pressure lower by 1.54 mmHg
  • heart rate lower by 1.42 beats per minute

No effect was seen on lipids (cholesterol and triglycerides), diastolic blood pressure, and C-reactive protein (a test of systemic inflammation).

Granted, these are tiny effects.  It’s unknown whether they, or other unknown effects of grape seed extract, would translate into clinical benefits such as fewer heart attacks and strokes, and longer lifespans.

Bottom Line

Grape seed extract and other non-wine grape products may be as beneficial as red wine in prolonging lifespan and preventing heart disease.  But we have much stronger evidence in favor of red wine and other alcohol-containing drinks.

Steve Parker, M.D.

 Reference:  Feringa, H.H.H, et al. The Effect of Grape Seed Extract on Cardiovascular Risk Markers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 111 (2011): 1,173-1,181.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

A Good Night On-Call

 

At the hospital last night, I admitted an elderly heart patient with chest pain.  I asked if he’d ever heard of the Mediterranean diet.  He answered, “What’s that? Does it mean you only eat those kinds of people?”

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: In the course of our conversation, he worked in five other one-line jokes. What a blessing.

PPS:  Q: Why did the cannibal eat the trapeze artist?

A: He wanted a balanced meal.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The Holy Grail of Diabetes Treatment: Preserving Beta Cell Function

 A Nobel Prize in Medicine belongs to whoever (whomever?) figures out how to reliably and affordably protect and preserve beta cell function starting early in the course of type 2 diabetes.  Or type 1 diabetes, for that matter.

Dietary carbohydrates lead to secretion of insulin into the bloodstream by the pancreas’s beta cells.  The insulin limits and reverses the rise in blood sugar that results from digestion of carbohydrates.  If blood sugar rises too high, it damages our bodies. 

Type 2 diabetes is a disorder of carbohydrate metabolism.  Insulin from the beta cells isn’t doing its job adequately because tissues that should be taking up bloodstream sugar are resistant to insulin’s effect of driving sugar into the cells.  The beta cells pump out increasing amounts of insulin, trying to overcome the resistance of the tissues.  Eventually the beta cells become exhausted or “burned out,” reflected in diminished beta cell mass.  This situation has usually been present for years before type 2 diabetes is formally diagnosed.  This scenario is a leading theory of the development of type 2 diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes is considered by most physicians to be a progressive illness, requiring more and more drugs to control as the years pass.  That’s because the beta cells are dying off or otherwise becoming totally nonfunctional.  Once they’re gone, it’s hard (impossible?) to get them back.  If diabetes could be diagnosed early on, we’d find healthier beta cells to work with.  Perhaps we could strengthen or protect them.  This is what beta cell preservation is all about.  Keep them working as nature intended, avoiding the expense and risks of drug therapy.

So I was excited to find an article entitled “Effects of exenatide on measures of beta cell function after three years in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.”  Exenatide is sold in the U.S. as Byetta.  It’s a GLP-1 analogue.  

European researchers studied 36 type 2 diabetics for three years.  All were taking metformin.  Sixteen of them also took exenatide, whereas 20 also took insulin glargine (e.g., Lantus in the U.S.). 

What Did They Find?

Both groups achieved similar levels of blood sugar control after three years.  Exanatide users lost 5.7  kg (12.5 lb) while glargine users gained 2.1 kg (4.6 lb). 

After three years of drug use, the subjects were told to stop exenatide and glargine while continuing metformin. After four weeks off-drug:

  • insulin sensitivity improved significantly in the exenatide group while glargine had no effect
  • first-phase insulin secretion improved by a small amount in the exenatide group

However, 12 weeks after stopping the study drugs, hemoglobin A1c and fasting blood sugars returned to pretreatment levels in both groups.  (Hemoglobin A1c is a blood test of overall diabetes control over the preceeding three months.)   

Final Thoughts

You have to wonder if the improved insulin sensitivity in the exenatide group simply reflects their weight loss as compared to the weight gain in the insulin glargine group.  Improved insulin sensitivity is good, any way you can get it. 

ResearchBlogging.orgWhen measured 12 weeks after stopping the study drugs, hemoglobin A1c and fasting blood sugar levels were no better than baseline levels three years earlier.  Very disappointing.  If exanatide or glargine preserved beta cell function, you’d want to see better post-treatment numbers.  The search for beta cell preservation continues.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Bunck, M., Corner, A., Eliasson, B., Heine, R., Shaginian, R., Taskinen, M., Smith, U., Yki-Jarvinen, H., & Diamant, M. (2011). Effects of Exenatide on Measures of Beta-Cell Function After 3 Years in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, 34 (9), 2041-2047 DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0291

PS: In case it matters to you, this study was funded at least partially by Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly and Company.

Comments Off on The Holy Grail of Diabetes Treatment: Preserving Beta Cell Function

Filed under Uncategorized

Insulin Resistance, Lipotoxicity, Type 2 Diabetes, and Atherosclerosis

This will bore most readers.

I just want to mention a scientific review article from 2009 that reviews insulin activity (down to a molecular level) in the context of type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, and insulin resistance.  Towards the end it starts sounding like an informercial for thiazolidinedione drugs

The author makes a great case for the dangers of hyperinsulinemia.

Good reference overall.

R. A. DeFronzo wrote “Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: the missing links. The Claude Bernard Lecture 2009.”   Diabetologia, 2010 (53); 1,270-1,287.  doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1684-1

Steve Parker, M.D.

1 Comment

Filed under Causes of Diabetes, coronary heart disease

Low-Carb Diet Reduces Weight AND Increases Adiponectin

Compared to a low-fat diet, a very-low-carb diet yielded better fat loss and improved adiponectin levels, according to researchers at the University of Cincinnati.  Read on to find out why this matters.

Adiponectin is a hormone-like protein secreted by fat cells. But the fatter you are, the less adiponectin you have in your bloodstream.  This hormone has several effects:

    • it’s anti-inflammatory
    • high levels of one form of it (a high molecular weight oligomer) are linked to lower rates of diabetes
    • low circulating levels are associatedwith athersclerosis (hardening of the arteries), high blood pressure, and impaired function of cells lining our arteries
    • it sensitizes the liver and muscles to insulin, which helps keep blood sugars under control

    In summary, it’s a good thing to have around.  Low levels are linked to illnesses.  Overweight and obesity tend to lower your levels of adiponectin.  If you’re overweight and have low levels of adiponectin, you should be healthier if you can raise your levels.  How do you do that?  Lose weight.

U. of Cincinnati investigators wanted to know if a very-low-carb diet would increase adiponectin levels better than a common low-fat weight loss diet.  They randomized 81 obese women to follow either a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) or a very-low-carbohydrate diet based on the Atkins diet.  Women followed the diets for either four or six months.

Findings

Both groups lost weight, but the very-low-carb group lost more: 9.1 kg loss for very-low-carb vs 4.97  for the low-fat group.

The very-low-carb group lost more body fat: 5.45 kg vs 2.62 kg.  (Fat loss was determined by DEXA scan.)

Adiponectin increased in the VLC group but not the LF group.

Discussion

We can’t tell from this article if adiponectin results would be the same in men.  The authors didn’t mention.

ResearchBlogging.orgIn fairness, the authors cite another similar study that found equal degrees of weight loss and adiponectin increase in both low-fat and low-carb groups.  It was a year-long intervention and average weight loss was 13.5% for both groups, a greater degree of weight loss than in the study at hand, in which the very-low-carb group lost 10% of body weight and the low-fat group lost 5.4%.  So you can probably increase your leptin with a low-fat diet if you lose enough excess weight.

Would the Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet work just as well as the very-low carb diet used in this study?  I suspect so, but don’t have the $500,000 it would take to do the research.  Care to donate?

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:
Summer, S., Brehm, B., Benoit, S., & D’Alessio, D. (2011). Adiponectin Changes in Relation to the Macronutrient Composition of a Weight-Loss Diet Obesity DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.60

8 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, Overweight and Obesity, Weight Regain

Which Of Three Low-Carb Diets Reduces Future Risk of Diabetes?

Men eating low-carb diets featuring protein and fats from sources other than red and processed meats may reduce risk of developing type 2 diabetes later, compared to other types of low-carb diets.  The same Boston-based researchers previously looked for a similar association in women and found none.

The article in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition seems to me unusually complicated, like the first sentence of this post.  It was frustrating to read, searching for but not finding much useful for clinical practice.  How low-carb were these diets?  Thirty-seven to 43% of energy from carbs in the most dedicated dieters, compared to 50-60% in the standard American diet.

After wading through most of this article, I came away with the impression the authors were just data-mining a huge database, to add one more item to their CVs (curriculum vitae).  This article is a confusing mess, or maybe I’m just stupid. I regret wasting an hour on it.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: De Konig, Lawrence, et al.  Low-carbohydrate diet scores and risk of type 2 diabetes in menAmercan Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2011. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.004333

4 Comments

Filed under Causes of Diabetes, Fat in Diet, Protein

History of Diabetes: Elizabeth Hughes, Insulin Pioneer

One of the very first users of insulin injections lived to be 73.  That amazes me since most of her life was lived before we could keep close track of blood sugar levels with home glucose monitoring.  She died of pneumonia in 1981.  She was a type 1 diabetic since age 11.

Insulin was discovered in Canada

Her name was Elizabeth Hughes, daughter of a New York governor.  She was started in insulin around 1922. 

I read about her in Nutrition Journal earlier this year.  Most of the article was about the use of starvation diets for diabetics in the pre-insulin era .  Ever heard of the Joslin Clinic, a preeminent U.S. diabetes center?  Elliott Joslin was once an advocate of these starvation diets.  Insulin changed that.

The article notes that before insulin therapy was available, the standard diabetic diet was low-carbohydrate, avoiding sugars and starches, sometimes called the “animal diet.”

I also learned that urine became easily testable for sugar in the early part of the 20th century, if not earlier.  Before this, many cases of diabetes (mostly type 2) were undetectable or misdiagnosed.

Even today, type 1 diabetes is a hard row to hoe.  Before 1922, it was even worse.  As bad as it can get.

Steve Parker, M.D.

7 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

WHY Is the Mediterranean Diet So Healthy?

I’ve found that nearly everbody’s eyes glaze over if I try to explain how, physiologically, the Mediterranean diet promotes health and longevity.  Below are some of the boring details, for posterity’s sake, mostly from my 2007 book, The Advanced Mediterranean Diet: Lose Weight, Feel Better, Live Longer.

Many of the nutrient-disease associations I mention below are just that: associations, linkages, not hard proof of a benefit.  Available studies are often contradictory.  For instance, there may be 10 observational studies linking whole grain consumption with reduced deaths from heart disease, while three other studies find no association, or even suggest  higher death rates. (I’m making these numbers up.)  If you want hard proof, you’ll have to wait.  A long time.  Such is nutrition science.  Take it all with a grain of salt. 

Also note that the studies supporting my claims below are nearly all done in non-diabetic populations.

Coronary Heart Disease

Coronary heart disease, also known as coronary artery disease, is the No.1 cause of death in the world. It’s responsible for 40% of deaths in the United States and other industrialized Western countries. The Mediterranean diet is particularly suited to mitigating the ravages of coronary heart disease. Mediterranean diet cardiac benefits may be related to its high content of monounsaturated fat (in olive oil), folate, and antioxidants.

The predominant source of fat in the traditional Mediterranean diet is olive oil, which is rich in monounsaturated fatty acids. High intake of olive oil reduces blood levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL (“bad”) cholesterol. HDL or “good” cho-lesterol is unaffected. Olive oil tends to lower blood pressure in hypertensive people. Monounsaturated fatty acids reduce cardiovascular risk substantially, particularly when they replace simple sugars and easily digestible starches. Monounsaturated fatty acids and olive oil may also reduce breast cancer risk. The cardioprotective (good for the heart) and cancer-reducing effects of olive oil may be partially explained by the oil’s polyphenolic compounds.
    
Nuts are another good source of monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids, including some omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nuts have been proven to be cardioprotective. They lower LDL and total cholesterol levels, while providing substantial fiber and numerous micronutrients, such as vitamin E, potassium, magnesium, and folic acid. Compared with those who never or rarely eat nuts, people who eat nuts five or more times per week have 30 to 50% less risk of a fatal heart attack. Lesser amounts of nuts are also cardioprotective, perhaps by reducing lethal heart rhythm dis-turbances. 
    
Another key component of the Mediterranean diet is fish. Fish are excellent sources of protein and are low in cholesterol. Fatty, cold-water fish are particularly good for us because of their omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexanaenoic acid (DHA). The other important omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid is alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), available in certain plants. Our bodies can convert ALA into EPA and DHA, but not very efficiently. Fish oil supplements, which are rich in EPA, lead to lower total cholesterol and triglyce-ride levels. Fish oil supplements have several properties that fight atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). In people who have already had a heart attack, the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids have proven to dramatically reduce cardiac deaths, especially sudden death, and nonfatal heart attacks. So omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are “cardioprotective.”

The first sign of underlying coronary heart disease in many people is simply sudden death from a heart attack (myocardial infarction) or heart rhythm disturbance. These unfortunate souls had hearts that were ticking time bombs. I have little doubt that a significant number of such deaths can be prevented by adequate intake of cold-water fatty fish. As a substitute for fish, fish oil supplements might be just at beneficial. The American Heart Association also recommends fish twice weekly for the general population, or fish oil supplements if whole fish isn’t feasible. Compared with fish oil capsules, whole fish are loaded with vitamins, minerals, and protein. The richest fish sources of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are albacore (white) tuna, salmon, sar-dines, trout, sea bass, sword-fish, herring, mackerel, anchovy, halibut, and pompano.
    
Cardioprotective omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (mainly ALA) are also provided by plants, such as nuts and seeds, legumes, and vegetables. Rich sources of ALA include walnuts, butternuts, soy-beans, flaxseed, almonds, leeks, purslane, pinto beans, and wheat germ. Purslane is also one of the few plant sources of EPA. Several oils are also very high in ALA: flaxseed, canola, and soybean. Look for them in salad dressings, or try cooking with them.

Macular Degeneration

Omega-3 fatty acid and fish consumption may also be “eye-protective.” Eating fish one to three times per week apparently helps prevent age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in people over 50 in the United States. While AMD has a significant hereditary component, onset and progression of AMD are affected by diet and lifestyle choices. For instance, smoking cigarettes definitely increases your risk of developing AMD. Other foods associated with lower risk of AMD are dark green leafy vegetables, orange and yellow vegetables and fruits: spinach, kale, collard greens, yellow corn, broccoli, sweet potatoes, squash, orange bell peppers, oranges, mangoes, apricots, peaches, honeydew melon, and papaya. Two unifying phytochemicals in this food list are lutein and zeaxanthin, which are also found in red grapes, kiwi fruit, lima beans, green beans, and green bell peppers. Increasing your intake of these foods as part of the Advanced Mediterranean Diet may well help preserve your vision as you age.      
    
Alzheimer’s Dementia
    
Another exciting potential benefit of fish consumption is prevention or delay of Alzheimer’s dementia. Several recent epidemiologic studies have suggested that intake of fish once or twice per week significantly reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s. Types of fish eaten were not specified. No one knows if fish oil capsules are equivalent. For now, I’m sticking with fatty cold-water fish, which I call my “brain food.”
    
Vitamin E supplements may slow the progression of established Alzheimer’s disease; clinical studies show either modest slowing of progression or no benefit. As a way to prevent Alzheimer’s, however, vitamin E supplements have been disappointing. On the other hand, high dietary vitamin E is associated with reduced risk of developing Alzheimer’s. Good sources of vitamin E include vegetable oils (especially sunflower and soybean), sunflower seeds, nuts, shrimp, fruits, and certain vegetables: sweet potatoes, asparagus, beans, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, carrots, okra, green peas, sweet peppers, spinach, and tomatoes. All of these are on your new diet. 

Wine

For centuries, the healthier populations in the Mediterranean region have enjoyed wine in light to moderate amounts, usually with meals. Epidemiologic studies there and in other parts of the world have associated reasonable alcohol consumption with prolonged lifespan, reduced coronary artery disease, diminished Alzheimer’s and other dementias, and possibly fewer strokes. Alcohol tends to increase HDL cholesterol, have an antiplatelet effect, and may reduce C-reactive protein, a marker of arterial inflammation. These effects would tend to reduce cardiovascular disease. Wine taken with meals provides antioxidant phytochemicals (polyphenols, procyanidins) which may protect against atherosclerosis and some cancers. 

What’s a “reasonable” amount of alcohol? An old medical school joke is that a “heavy drinker” is anyone who drinks more than the doctor does. Light to moderate alcohol consumption is generally consi-dered to be one or fewer drinks per day for a woman, two or fewer drinks per day for a man. One drink is 5 ounces of wine, 12 ounces of beer, or 1.5 ounces of 80 proof distilled spirits (e.g., vodka, whiskey, gin). The optimal health-promoting type of alcohol is unclear. I tend to favor wine, a time-honored component of the Mediterranean diet. Red wine in particular is a rich source of resveratrol, which is thought to be a major contributor to the cardioprotective benefits associated with light to moderate alcohol consumption. Grape juice may be just as good—it’s too soon to tell.
    
I have no intention of overselling the benefits of alcohol. If you are considering habitual alcohol as a food, be aware that the health benefits are still somewhat debatable. Consumption of three or more alcoholic drinks per day is clearly associated with a higher risk of breast cancer in women. Even one or two drinks daily may slightly increase the risk. Folic acid supplementation might mitigate the risk. If you are a woman and breast cancer runs in your family, strongly consider abstinence. Be cautious if there are alcoholics in your family; you may have inherited the predisposition. If you take any medications or have chronic medical conditions, check with your personal physician first. For those drinking above light to mod-erate levels, alcohol is clearly perilous. Higher dosages can cause hypertension, liver disease, heart failure, certain cancers, and other medical problems. And psychosocial problems. And legal problems. And death. Heavy drinkers have higher rates of violent and accidental death. Alcoholism is often fatal. You should not drink alcohol if you:
            ■  have a history of alcohol abuse
                or alcoholism
            ■  have liver or pancreas disease
            ■  are pregnant or trying to become
                pregnant
            ■  may have the need to operate
                dangerous equipment or machinery,
                such as an automobile, while under
                the influence of alcohol
            ■  have a demonstrated inability to
                limit yourself to acceptable
                intake levels
            ■  have personal prohibitions due
                to religious, ethical, or other
                reasons. 
    
Cancer

Do you ever worry about cancer? You should. It’s the second leading cause of death. Over 500,000 people die from cancer each year in the United States. One third of people in the United States will develop cancer. Twenty percent of us will die from cancer. About half the deaths are from cancer of the lung, breast, and colon/rectum. Are you worried yet?

According to the American Cancer Society, one third of all cancer deaths can be attributed to diet and inadequate physical activity. So we have some control over our risk of developing cancer. High consumption of fruits and vegetables seems to protect against cancer of the lung, stomach, colon, rectum, oral cavity, and esophagus, although other studies dispute the protective linkage. Data on other cancers is limited or inconsistent. If you typically eat little or no fruits and vegetables, you can start today to cut your cancer risk by up to one half. Five servings of fresh fruits and vegetables a day seems to be the protective dose against cancer. Make it a life-long habit. The benefits accrue over time. Fruits and vegetables contain numerous phytochemicals thought to improve or maintain health, such as carotenoids (e.g., lycopene), lignans, phytosterols, sulfides, isothyocyanates, phenolic compounds (includ-ing flavonoids, resveratrol, phytoestrogens, anthocyanins, and tannins), protease inhibitors, capsaicin, vitamins, and minerals. 
   
In addition to cancer prevention properties, fruits and vegetables provide fiber, which is the part of plants resistant to digestion by our enzymes. The other source of fiber is grain products, especially whole grains. Liberal intake of fiber helps prevent constipation, diverticular disease, hemorrhoids, irritable bowel syndrome, and perhaps colon polyps. Soluble fiber helps control blood sugar levels in diabetics. It also reduces LDL cholesterol levels, thereby reducing risks of coronary heart disease. Whether or not related to fiber, high fruit and vegetable intake may reduce the risks of coronary heart disease and stroke. Legume consumption in particular has been associated with a 10 to 20% lower risk of coronary heart disease, with the effective dose being around four servings per week. 

Fiber and Whole Grains

Processed, refined grain products have much less fiber than do whole grains. For instance, white all-purpose enriched flour has only about one fourth the fiber of whole wheat flour. The milling process removes the bran, germ, and husk (chaff), leaving only the endosperm as the refined product, flour. Endosperm is mostly starch and 10–15% protein. Many nutrients are lost during processing. The germ is particularly rich in vitamins (especially B vitamins), polyunsaturated fatty acids, antioxidants, trace minerals, and phytochemicals. Phytochemicals protect us against certain chronic diseases. Bran is high in fiber and nutrients: B vitamins, iron, magnesium, copper, and zinc, to name a few. Enriched grain products are refined grains that have had some, but certainly not all, nutrients added back, typically iron, thiamin, niacin, riboflavin, and folate. Why not just eat the whole grain? Whole grain products retain nearly all the nutrients found in the original grain. Hence, they are more nutritious than refined and enriched grain products.
    
Liberal intake of high-fiber whole grain foods, as contrasted with refined grains, is linked to lower risk of death and lower incidence of coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. For existing diabetics, whole grain consumption can help im-prove blood sugar levels. Three servings of whole grains per day cut the risk of coronary heart disease by about 25 percent compared with those who rarely eat whole grains. Regular consumption of whole grains may also substantially reduce the risk of sev-eral forms of cancer.

Average adult fiber intake in the United States is 12 to 15 grams daily. Expert nutrition panels and the American Heart Association recommend 25 to 30 grams daily from whole grains, fruits, and vegetables.

The health benefits of the Mediterranean diet likely spring from synergy among multiple Mediteranean diet components, rather than from a single food group or one or a few food items. 

Steve Parker, M.D.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized