A tip for guys who like to wear speedos. It helps to carry a potato in your speedo. But make sure you wear it in the front.
Quote of the Day
Filed under Quote of the Day
U.S. Diabetes Prevalence From 1935 to 2011
From 1935 to 1996, the prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes [in the U.S.] climbed nearly 765%.
This statistic is from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as cited in Increased Consumption of Refined Carbohydrates and the Epidemic of Type 2 Diabetes in the United States: an Ecologic Assessment, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2004, vol. 79, no.5, pp: 774-779.
I thought 765% might be a misprint, so I did some digging. A similar figure is in DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 82-1232 published in 1981:
- Diabetes prevalence rose from 0.4% of the population in 1935, to 2.4% in 1979.
This is a six-fold increase. The major part of the upward trend started in 1960. Interestingly, that’s when corn syrup started working its way into our food supply. Coincidence? The authors of the Department of Human Services paper write:
Preliminary evaluation of these trends suggests that the change in the prevalence of known diabetes has resulted from improvements both in detection of diabetes among high-risk groups and in survivorship among persons with diabetes.
To me, it sounds like they weren’t considering an true increase in the number of new diabetes cases (incidence), but better detection of existing cases and improved longevity of existing patients (prevalence). Incidence and prevalence are often confusing. Wikipedia has a clarifying article. These days, both incidence and prevalence are greatly increased over 1935 levels.
In January of 2011, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released the latest estimates for prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes. The situation is worse than it was in 2008, the last figures available.
- 8.3% of the total U.S. population has either diagnosed or undiagnosed diabetes (earlier percentages in this post were for diagnosed cases only)
- 6% of the U.S. adult population has diagnosed diabetes (My calculation: Population in 2011 was 311 million; with 18.8 million diagnosed cases of diabetes, 7 million undiagnosed)
- Nearly 27% of American adults age 65 or older have diabetes (overwhelmingly type 2)
- Half of Americans 65 and older have prediabetes
- 11% of U.S. adults (nearly 26 million) have diabetes (overwhelmingly type 2)
- 35% of adults (79 million) have prediabetes, and most of those affected don’t know it
Here’s a post about prevention of type 2 diabetes.
Comments Off on U.S. Diabetes Prevalence From 1935 to 2011
Filed under DM Prevalence
Science in Support of the Paleo Diet
I reviewed this research report in my effort to determine if the paleo diet—aka Old Stone Age, caveman, ancestral, or Paleolithic diet—has anything to offer diabetics.
Published in 2008, this seems to be one of the seminal scientific studies of the paleo diet in modern Europeans.
Their version of the paleo diet:
- Allowed ad lib: All fresh or frozen fruits, berries and vegetables except legumes, canned tomatoes w/o additives, fresh or frozen unsalted fish and seafood, fresh or frozen unsalted lean meats and minced meat, unsalted nuts (except peanuts – a legume), fresh squeezed lemon or lime juice (as dressing), flaxseed or rapeseed oil (as dressing), coffee and tea (w/o sugar, milk, honey, or cream), all salt-free spices.
- Allowed but with major restrictions: dried fruit, salted seafood, fat meat, potatoes (two medium-sized per day), honey, cured meats
- Prohibited: all milk and dairy products, all grain products (including corn and rice), all legumes, canned food except tomatoes, candy, ice cream, soft drinks, juices, syrups, alcohol, sugar, and salt
What Did They Find After Three Weeks?
- Average weight dropped from 65.2 kg (144 lb) to 62.9 (139 lb)
- Average body mass index fell from 22.2 to 21.4
- Average waist circumference decreased from 74.3 cm (29.25″) to 72.6 cm (28.58″)
- Average systolic blood pressure fell from 110 to 104 mmHg
- plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 decreased from 5.0 kIE/l to 2.8 kIE/l
- All of these changes were statistically significant
The researchers looked at a number of other blood tests and didn’t find any significant differences.
Five men and three women completed the study. Of the 20 who originally signed up, one could not fulfill the diet, three became ill (no details), two failed to show up.
So What?
That’s a remarkable weight loss over just three weeks for slender people eating ad lib.
The study authors concluded that these paleo diet-induced changes could reduce risk for cardiovascular disease. They called for a larger study with a control group. (If it’s been done, I haven’t found it yet.)
Sounds reasonable.
PS: You’d think they would have said more about the three participants who got sick, rather than leave us wondering if the diet made them ill.
Reference: Österdahl, M; Kocturk, T; Koochek, A;Wändell, PE. Effects of a short-term intervention with a paleolithic diet in healthy volunteers. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 62 (2008): 682-685.
Filed under Heart Disease, Paleo diet, Weight Loss
Heart Disease Death Rates For Diabetics Falling Fast
MedPage Today on May 22, 2012, reported a dramatic drop in cardiovascular death rates for folks with diabetes:
The death rate from cardiovascular disease in U.S. adults with diabetes fell 40% from 1997 to 2004, CDC and NIH researchers said.
And that’s not all:
Additionally, all-cause mortality in diabetic participants dropped by 23% (95% CI 10% to 35%), Gregg and colleagues reported, from 20.3 to 15.1 per 1,000 person-years after adjusting for age.
The researchers identified several factors that likely account for the improved life expectancy for diabetic Americans.
Among them was the “steady improvements in quality and organization of care, self-management behaviors, and medical treatments, including pharmacological treatment of hyperlipidemia and hypertension,” Gregg and colleagues suggested.
The MedPage Today article didn’t define cardiovascular disease. It typically includes heart attacks, heart failure, strokes, aortic aneurysms, among a few others.
Hope that cheers you up!
PS: Here’s the original research article in the current issue of Diabetes Care.
Filed under coronary heart disease, Diabetes Complications, Heart Disease, Stroke
Prediabetes and Diabetes on the Rise in U.S. Adolescents, Doubling in a Decade
The June, 2012, issue of Pediatrics has an article stating that the incidence of diabetes and prediabetes in U.S. adolescents increased from 9% in 1999 to 23% in 2008. The finding is based on the NHANES survey of 12 to 19-year-olds, which included a single fasting blood sugar determination.
The investigators offered no solution to the problem. I’m no pediatrician, but my guess is that the following measures would help prevent adolescent type 2 diabetes and prediabetes:
- more exercise
- eat less sugar and refined starches
- keep body weight in the healthy range
PS: I scanned the article quickly and don’t remember if the researchers broke down the diabetes cases by type 1 and type 2. I’d be shocked if type 1 diabetes rose this much over the last decade.
Filed under DM Prevalence, Prediabetes
Bladder Cancer Linked With Diabetes Drugs in Thiazolidinedione Class
MedPage Today reports that thiazolidinediones (aka glitazones) are linked to development of bladder cancer. Pioglitazone is the most commonly used TZD in the U.S. From the article:
The increased risk of bladder cancer associated with glitazones — which reached a relative increase of 72% in patients who started on the agents more than 5 years earlier — “appears to be a class effect,” the research team, led by Ronac Mamtani, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, concluded.
According to the National Cancer Institute, the U.S. has 74,000 new cases of bladder cancer yearly, and 15,000 annual deaths from bladder cancer.
If you take a thiazolidinedione, talk to your doctor about bladder cancer at your next visit.
Filed under cancer, Drugs for Diabetes
Latest Research: 1) Sleep Patterns and Diabetes, 2) Drop Metformin When You Start Insulin?
1) Lack of sleep coupled with disrupted day-night cycles predisposes to diabetes and prediabetes. Night-shift workers take note.
2) Compared to those using metformin alone, type 2 diabetics who also took insulin needed less insulin and had better blood sugar levels. Real-world benefits are not entirely clear.
Filed under Drugs for Diabetes
Random Thoughts On Paleo Eating for People With Diabetes
In preparation, I collected some random thoughts and did a little research.
What’s the paleo diet?
Fresh, minimally processed food. Meat (lean or not? supermarket vs yuppiefied?), poultry, eggs, fish, leafy greens and other vegetables, nuts, berries, fruit, and probably tubers.
Non-paleo: highly processed, grains, refined sugars, industrial plant/seed oils, legumes, milk, cheese, yogurt.
The paleo diet is also called Old Stone Age, caveman, ancestral, hunter-gatherer, and Paleolithic diet.
Is the paleo diet deficient in any nutrients?
A quick scan of Loren Cordain’s website found mention of possible calcium and vitamin D deficits. Paleoistas will get vitamin D via sun exposure and fish (especially cold-water fatty fish). Obtain calcium from broccoli, kale, sardines, almonds, collards. (I wonder if the Recommended Dietary Allowance for calcium is set too high.)
What About Carbohydrates and Diabetes and the Paleo Diet?
Diabetes is a disorder of carbohydrate metabolism. In a way, it’s an intolerance of carbohydrates. In type 1 diabetes, there’s a total or near-total lack of insulin production on an autoimmune basis. In type 2 diabetes, the body’s insulin just isn’t working adequately; insulin production can be high, normal or low. In both cases, ingested carboydrates can’t be processed in a normal healthy way, so they stack up in the bloodstream as high blood sugars. If not addressed adequately, high blood glucose levels sooner or later will poison body tissues . Sooner in type 1, later in type 2. (Yes, this is a gross over-simplification.)
If you’re intolerant of lactose or gluten, you avoid those. If you’re intolerant of carbohydrates, you could avoid eating them, or take drugs to help you overcome your intolerance. Type 1 diabetics must take insulin. Insulin’s more optional for type 2’s. We have 11 classes of drugs to treat type 2 diabetes; we don’t know the potential adverse effects of most of these drugs. Already, three diabetes drugs have been taken off the U.S. market or severely restricted due to unacceptable toxicity: phenformin, troglitazone, and rosiglitazone.Humans need two “essential fatty acids” and nine “essential” amino acids derived from proteins. “Essential” means we can’t be healthy and live long without them. Our bodies can’t synthesize them. On the other hand, there are no essential carbohydrates. Our bodies can make all the carbohydrate (mainly glucose) we need.
Since there are no essential carbohydrates, and we know little about the long-term adverse side effects of many of the diabetes drugs, I favor carbohydrate restriction for people with carboydrate intolerance. (To be clear, insulin is safe, indeed life-saving, for those with type 1 diabetes.)
That being said, let’s think about the Standard American Diet (SAD) eaten by an adult. It provides an average of 2673 calories a day. Added sugars provide 459 of those calories, or 17% o the total. Grains provide 625 calories, or 23% of the total. And most of those sugars and grains are in processed, commercial foods. So added sugars and grains provide 40% of the total calories in the SAD. (Figures are from an April 5, 2011, infographic at Civil Eats.)
Anyone going from the SAD to pure Paleo eating will be drastically reducing intake of added sugars and grains, our current major sources of carbohydrate. Question is, what will they replace those calories with?
That’s why I gave a thumbnail sketch of the paleo diet above. Take a gander and you’ll see lots of low-carb and no-carb options, along with some carb options. For folks with carbohydrate intolerance, I’d favor lower-carb veggies and judicious amounts of fruits, berries, and higher-carb veggies and
tubers. “Judicious” depends on the individual, considering factors such as degree of residual insulin production, insulin sensitivity, the need to lose excess weight, and desire to avoid diabetes drugs.Compared to the standard “diabetic diet” (what’s that?) and the Standard American Diet, switching to paleo should lower the glycemic index and glycemic load of the diet. Theoretically, that should help with blood sugar control.
A well-designed low-carb paleo diet would likely have at least twice as much fiber as the typical American diet, which would also tend to limit high blood sugar excursions.
In general, I favor a carbohydrate-restricted paleo diet for those with diabetes who have already decided to “go paleo.” I’m not endorsing any paleo diet for anyone with diabetes at this point—I’m still doing my research. But if you’re going to do it, I’d keep it lower-carb. E.g., under 100 g of digestible carb daily. It has a lot of potential.
Are There Any Immediate Dangers for a Person With Diabetes Switching to the Paleo Diet?
It depends on three things: 1) current diet, and 2) current drug therapy, and 3) the particular version of paleo diet followed.
Remember, the Standard American Diet provides 40% of total calories as added sugars and grains (nearly all highly refined). Switching from SAD to a low-carb paleo diet will cut carb intake and glycemic load substantially, raising the risk of hypoglycemia if the person is taking certain drugs.
Drugs with potential to cause hypoglycemia include insulin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, pramlintide, and perhaps thiazolidinediones.
Who knows about carb content of the standard “diabetic diet”? Contrary to poplular belief, there is no monolithic “diabetic diet.” There is no ADA diet (American Diabetes Association). My impression, however, is that the ADA favors relatively high carbohydrate consumption, perhaps 45-60% of total calories. Switching to low-carb paleo could definitely cause hypoglycemia in those taking the aforementioned drugs.
One way to avoid diet-induced hypoglycemia is to reduce the diabetic drug dose.
A type 2 overweight diabetic eating a Standard American Diet—and I know there are many out there—would tend to see lower glucose levels by switching to probably any of the popular paleo diets. Be ready for hypoglycemia if you take those drugs.
Paleo diets are not necessarily low-carb. Konner and Eaton estimate that ancestral hunter-gatherers obtained 35 to 40% of total calories from carbohydrates. I’ve seen other estimates as low as 22%. Reality likely falls between 22 and 65%. When pressed for a brief answer as to how many carbohydrate calories are in the paleo diet, I say “about a third of the total.” By comparison, the typical U.S. diet provides 50% of calories from carbohydrate.
Someone could end up with a high-carb paleo diet easily, by emphasizing tubers (e.g., potatoes), higher-carb vegetables, fruits, berries, and nuts (especially cashews). Compared with the SAD, this could cause higher or lower blood sugars, or no net change.
A diabetic on a Bernstein-style diet or Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet (both very-low-carb) but switching to paleo or low-carb paleo (50-150 g?) would see elevated blood sugars. Perhaps dangerously high glucoses.
Any person with diabetes making a change in diet should do it in consultation with a personal physician or other qualified healthcare professional familiar with their case.
Fun Facts!
- A typical carbonated soda contain the equivalent of 10 tsp (50 ml) of sugar.
- The typical U.S. adult eats 30 tsp (150 ml) daily of added sweeteners and sugars.
- U.S total grain product consumption was at record lows in the 1970s, at 138 pounds per person. By 2000, grain consumption was up by 45%, to 200 pounds per person.
- Total caloric sweetener consumption (by dry weight) was 110 pounds per person in the 1950s. By 2000, it was up 39% to 150 pounds.
- Between 1970 and 2003, consumption of added fats and oils rose by 63%, from 53 to 85 pounds. [How tasty would that be without starches and sugars? Not very.]
- In 2008, “added fat” calories in the U.S. adult diet were 641 (24% of total calories).
Fun Facts provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Time to Update Your Strength Training Regimen?
Strength training, also called resistance training, is an important method for controlling blood sugars without drugs in folks with diabetes.
A few months ago I read Hillfit: Stength, an ebook by Chris Highcock of Conditioning Research. It’s about improvement of hiking skills and enjoyment via strength training with without having to join a gym or buy lots of equipment. I’ve been on Chris’s program for the last five weeks.
One of the scientific review articles he cites in support of his recommendations is an eye-opener. Evidence-Based Resistance Training Recommendations is available free online. It’s published in Medicina Sportiva, which I’m not familiar with. I’ll confess I’ve read little of the hard-core literature on the science of strength training. It’s one of my more recent interests.
An excerpt:
We recommend that appreciably the same muscular strength and endurance adaptations can be attained by performing a single set of ~8-12 repetitions to momentary muscular failure, at a repetition duration that maintains muscular tension throughout the entire range of motion, for most major muscle groups once or twice each week. All resistance types (e.g. free-weights, resistance machines, bodyweight, etc.) show potential for increases in strength, with no significant difference between them, although resistance machines appear to pose a lower risk of injury.
The article has got me questioning some of my long-held notions, such as how often to work out, number of reps moving a weight, speed of moving a weight, and whether I should stick with the free weights I tend to prefer. Why not see if your dogma is supported? Worth a look.
Fisher, James, et al. Evidence-based resistance training recommendations. Medicina Sportiva, 15 (2011): 147-162.
Filed under Exercise
Quote of the Day
The sovereign invigorator of the body is exercise, and of all the exercises walking is the best.
Comments Off on Quote of the Day
Filed under Exercise
![MP900432834[1]](https://paleodiabetic.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/mp9004328341.jpg?w=300&h=200)
![MP900262872[1]](https://paleodiabetic.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/mp9002628721.jpg?w=300&h=201)
![MP900444465[1]](https://paleodiabetic.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/mp9004444651.jpg?w=300&h=199)
![MP900178842[1]](https://paleodiabetic.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/mp9001788421.jpg?w=300&h=201)



