Category Archives: coronary heart disease

May 17, 2010 · 12:22 AM

Low-Carb Mediterranean Diet Improves Glucose Control and Heart Risk Factors in Overweight Diabetics

In overweight type 2 diabetics, a low-carbohydrate Mediterranean diet improved HDL cholesterol levels and glucose control better than either the standard Mediterranean diet or American Diabetes Association diet, according to Israeli researchers reporting earlier this year.

Background

Prior studies suggest that diets rich in monounsaturated fatty acids (olive oil, for example) elevate HDL cholesterol and reduce LDL cholestrol and triglycerides in type 2 diabetics.

Low-carb diets improve blood sugar levels and reduce excess body weight in type 2 diabetics, leading to the ADA’s allowance in 2008 of a low-carbohydrate diet as an alternative to standard diabetic diets.

Many—probably most—type 2 diabetics have insulin resistance:  the body’s cells that can remove sugar from the bloodstream are not very sensitive to the effect of insulin driving sugar into those cells.  They “resist” insulin’s effect.  Consumption of monounsaturated fatty acids  improves insulin sensitivity.  In other words, insulin is better able to push blood sugar into cells, removing it from the bloodstream.

Previous studies have shown that both low-carb diets and the Mediterranean diet reduce after-meal elevations in blood sugar, which likely lowers levels of triglycerides and LDL cholesterol.

How Was the Study Done?

The goal was to compare effects of three diets in overweight type 2 diabetics in Israel over the course of one year.  Study participants totalled 259.  Average age was 56, average weight 86 kg (189 lb), average hemoglobin A1c 8.3%, and average fasting plasma glucose (sugar) was 10.3 mmol/L (185 mg/dl).  [Many diabetics in the U.S. fit this profile.]  People taking insulin were excluded from the study, as were those with proliferative diabetic retinopathy—no reasons given. 

Participants were randomly assigned to one of three diets, so there were about 85 in each group.  [Over the course of one year, people dropped out of the study for various reasons, leaving each group with about 60 subjects.] 

Here are the diets:

  • 2003 ADA (American Diabetes Association) diet:  50-55% of total caloric intake from carbohydrate (mixed glycemic index carbs), 30%  from fat, 20% from protein
  • Traditional Mediterranean (TM):  50-55% low-glycemic-index carbs, 30% fat—high in monounsaturated fat, 15-20% protein
  • Low-carb Mediterranean (LCM) :  35% low-glycemic-index carbs, 45% fat—high in monounsaturated fat, 15-20% protein

Patients were followed-up by the same dietitian every two weeks for one year.  All were advised to do aerobic exercise for 30-45 minutes at least three days a week.

Olive oil is traditionally the predominant form of fat in the Mediterranean diet and is a particularly rich source of monounsaturated fat.  At no point in this report was olive oil mentioned, nor any other source of monounsaturated fat.  Until I hear otherwise, I will assume that olive oil was the major source of monounsaturated fat in the TM and LCM diets. 

 All diets were designed to provide 20 calories per kilogram of body weight. 

In all three diets, saturated fat provided 7% of total calories.  Monounsaturated fatty acids provided 23% of total calories in the LCM, and  10% in the other two diets.  Polyunsaturated fatty acids provided 15% of calories in the LCM, and 12% in the other two diets.  The ADA diet provided 15 grams of fiber, the TM had 30 g, and the LCM had 45 g.

Adherence to the assigned diet was assessed with a “food frequency questionnaire” administered at six months.

What Did the Researchers Find?

Average reported energy intake was similar in all three groups: 2,222 calories per day.

Monounsaturated fat intake differences were statistically significant: 14.6, 12.8, and 12.6% for the LCM, TM, and ADA diets, respectively.  Polyunsaturated fat intake differences were statistically significant: 12.9, 11.5, and 11.2% for the LCM, TM, and ADA diets, respectively.

Percentage of energy from carbs was highest for the ADA diet (45.4%), intermediate for the TM diet (45.2%), and lowest for the LCM diet (41.9%).

At the end of 12 months, all three groups lost about the same amount of weight (8-9 kg or 18-20 lb), body mass index, and waist circumference.

Hemoglobin A1c fell in all three groups, but was significantly greater for the LCM group than for the ADA diet (6.3% absolute value vs 6.7%).

Triglycerides fell in all three groups, but was significantly greater for the LCM diet compared to the ADA diet.

The LCM group achieved a significant increase (12%) in HDL cholesterol compared to the ADA diet, but not different from the TM group.

LDL cholesterol fell in all three groups, and the LCM group’s drop (25%) was clearly superior to that of the ADA diet (14%) but about the same as the TM diet (21%).

Conclusions of the Investigators

We found that an intensive community-based dietary intervention reduced cardiovascular risk factors in overweight patients with [type 2 diabetes] for all three diets.  The LCM group had improved cardiovascular risk factors compared to either the ADA or the TM groups.

Only the LCM improved HDL levels and was superior to both the ADA and TM in improving glycaemic control.

It would appear that the low carbohydrate Mediterranean diet should be recommended for overweight diabetic patients.

My Comments

There’s no way the average diabetic could replicate this low-carb Mediterranean diet without working closely with a dietitian or nutritionist.

Any superiority of this low-carb Mediterranean diet may have as much to do with the increased monounsaturated fat intake as with the reduced carb consumption.  Monounsaturated fatty acid consumption is thought to improve insulin sensitivity. 

NutritionData’s Nutrient Search Tool can give you a list of foods high in monounsaturated fat.

The Mediterranean diet and low-carb diets independently have been shown to lower after-meal glucose levels, which probably lowers LDL cholesterol and triglycerides.

I’m disappointed the dietitians were not able to achieve a lower level of carbohydrate consumption in the low-carb Mediterranean diet group.  I suspect if they had, improvements in glucose control and lipids would have been even better.  But proof awaits another day.

We saw last year an article in the Annals of Internal Medicine that showed a dramatic reduction in the need for glucose-lowering drugs in type 2 diabetics following a different low-carb Mediterranean diet over four years, compared to a low-fat American Heart Association diet.  These two studies convince me a low-carb Mediterranean diet has real life-preserving and life-enhancing potential. 

Diabetics looking for a low-carb Mediterranean diet today have several options:

If you’re aware of any other low-carb, explicitly Mediterranean-style diets, please share in the Comments section.

Steve Parker, M.D. 

References: 

Elhayany, A., Lustman, A., Abel, R., Attal-Singer, J., and Vinker, S.  A low carbohydrate Mediterranean diet improves cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes control among overweight patients with type 2 dabetes mellitus:  a 1-year prospective randomized intervention study.  Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 12 (2010): 204-209.

Esposito, Katherine, et al.  Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on the need for antihyperglycemic drug therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.  Annals of Internal Medicine, 151 (2009): 306-314.

2 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, coronary heart disease, Fat in Diet, Glycemic Index and Load, Mediterranean Diet, olive oil

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

April 24, 2010 · 8:21 AM

Whole Grains Reduce Heart Attacks and Strokes

Whole grain consumption is associated with a 21% reduction in cardiovascular disease when compared to minimal whole grain intake, according to a 2008 review article in Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Disease.   

Coronary heart disease is the No. 1 killer in the developed world.  Stroke is No. 3.  The term “cardiovascular disease” lumps together heart attacks, strokes, high blood pressure,  and generalized atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). 

Investigators at Wake Forest University reviewed seven pertinent studies looking at whole grains and cardiovascular disease.  The studies looked at groups of people, determining their baseline food consumption via questionnaire, and noted disease development over time.  These are called “prospective cohort studies.” 

None of these cohorts was composed purely of diabetics.

The people eating greater amounts of whole grain (average of 2.5 servings a day) had 21% lower risk of cardiovascular disease events compared to those who ate an average of 0.2 servings a day.  Disease events included heart disease, strokes, and fatal cardiovascular disease.  The lower risk was similar in degree whether the focus was on heart disease, stroke, or cardiovascular death.

Note that refined grain consumption was not associated with cardiovascular disease events. 

Why does this matter?

The traditional Mediterranean diet is rich in whole grains, which may help explain why the diet is associated with lower rates of cardiovascular disease.  If we look simply at longevity, however, a recent study found no benefit to the cereal grain component of the Mediterranean diet.  Go figure . . . doesn’t add up. 

Readers here know that over the last four months I’ve been reviewing the nutritional science literature that supports the disease-suppression claims for consumption of fruits, vegetables, and legumes.  I’ve been disappointed.  Fruit and vegetable consumption does not lower risk of cancer overall, nor does it prevent heart disease.  I haven’t found any strong evidence that legumes prevent or treat any disease, or have an effect on longevity.  Why all the literature review?  I’ve been deciding which healthy carbohydrates diabetics and prediabetics should add back into their diets after 8–12 weeks of the Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet.

The study at hand is fairly persuasive that whole grain consumption suppresses heart attacks and strokes and cardiovascular death.  [The paleo diet advocates and anti-gluten folks must be disappointed.]  I nominate whole grains as additional healthy carbs, perhaps the healthiest.

But . . .

. . .  for diabetics, there’s a fly in the ointment: the high carbohydrate content of grains often lead to high spikes in blood sugar.  It’s a pity, since diabetics are prone to develop cardiovascular disease and whole grains could counteract that.  We need a prospective cohort study of whole grain consumption in diabetics.  It’ll be done eventually, but I’m not holding my breath.

[Update June 12, 2010: The aforementioned study has been done in white women with type 2 diabetes.  Whole grain and bran consumption do seem to protect them against overall death and cardiovascular death.  The effect is not strong.]

What’s a guy or gal to do with this information now?

Non-diabetics:  Aim to incorporate two or three servings of whole grain daily into your diet if you want to lower your risk of heart disease and stroke. 

Diabetics:  Several options come to mind:

  1. Eat whatever you want and forget about it [not recommended].
  2. Does coronary heart disease runs in your family?  If so, try to incorporate one or two servings of whole grains daily, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar one and two hours after consumption.  Eating whole grains alone will generally spike blood sugars higher than if you eat them with fats and protein.  Review acceptable blood sugar levels here.
  3. Regardless of family history, try to eat one or two servings of whole grains a day, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar.  Then decide if it’s worth it.  Do you have to increase your diabetic drug dosages or add a new drug?  Are you tolerating the drugs?  Can you afford them?    
  4. Assess all your risk factors for developing heart disease: smoking, sedentary lifestyle, high blood pressure, age, high LDL cholesterol, family history, etc.  If you have multiple risk factors, see Option #3.  And modify the risk factors under your control.   
  5. Get your personal physician’s advice.    

Steve Parker, M.D.

Extra Credit:  The study authors suggest a number of reasons—and cite pertinent scientific references—how whole grains might reduce heart disease:

  • improved glucose homeostasis (protection against insulin resistance, less rise in blood sugar after ingestion [compared to refined grains], improved insulin sensitivity or beta-cell function)
  • advantageous blood lipid effects (soluble fiber from whole grains [especially oats] reduces LDL cholesterol, lower amounts of the small LDL particles thought to be particularly damaging to arteries, tendency to raise HDL cholesterol and trigylcerides [seen with insulin resistance in the metabolic syndrome])
  • improved function of the endothelial cells lining the arteries (improved vascular reactivity)

Disclaimer:  All matters regarding your health require supervision by a personal physician or other appropriate health professional familiar with your current health status.  Always consult your personal physician before making any dietary or exercise changes.

Reference: Mellen, P.B, Walsh, T.F., and Herrington, D.M.  Whole grain intake and cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis.  Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease, 18 (2008): 283-290.

14 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, coronary heart disease, Diabetes Complications, Grains, ketogenic diet, legumes, Mediterranean Diet, Stroke

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,

April 21, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Red Wine Improves Circulation

Red wine’s beneficial health effects may be related to improved circulation, according to a recent study by Israeli researchers.

Red wine is a time-honored component of the healthy Mediterranean diet.  Consumption is associated with longer lifespan and less cardiovascular disease such as heart attacks. 

Israeli investigators had 14 young healthy volunteers drink 250 cc of red wine daily for 21 days, while monitoring markers of circulatory function.  Endothelial progenitor cells may be particularly important in maintenance, repair, and formation of the arterial circulatory system.

Here’s their conclusion:

The results of the present study indicate that red wine exerts its effect through the up-regulation of CXCR4 expression and activation of the SDF1/CXCR4/Pi3K/Akt/eNOS signaling pathway, which results in increased [endothelial progenitor cell] migration and proliferation and decreased extent of apoptosis. Our findings suggest that these effects could be linked to the mechanism of cardiovascular protection that is associated with the regular consumption of red wine.

I’m not going to tell you I understand all that.  Don’t feel bad if you don’t, either.  My point is to illustrate one way that Science makes progress.  An observant person notices, “Hey, people who drink judicious amounts of red wine seem to live longer and have fewer heart attacks.  I wonder how that works.”  Perhaps a plausible mechanism is identified.  That might lead to isolation of a specific component in red wine that yields the benefit.  Then that component is produced and disseminated, leading to the health benefits, without the risks of alcohol consumption.

It’s an expensive, time-consuming enterprise with many blind alleys.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:  Hamed, Saher, et al.  Red wine consumption improves the in vitro migration of endothelial progenitor cells in young, healthy individuals.  American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 14, 2010.    doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28408

1 Comment

Filed under Alcohol, coronary heart disease, Health Benefits, Mediterranean Diet

Tagged as , , , ,

April 10, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Fruits and Vegetables DON’T Prevent Heart Disease

Fruit and vegetable consumption does not seem to reduce the risk of heart attacks (coronary heart disease), according to a recent literature review by French epidemiologists.

I recently wrote about a study that found no overall reduced risk of cancer via consumption of fruits and vegetables.

Heart attacks and cancer are the first and second leading causes of death in the developed world.

So just why, again, are we supposed to be eating our fruits and vegetables?

Here’s most of the abstract written by the epidemiologists:

This Review summarizes the evidence for a relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and the occurrence of coronary heart disease…Most of the evidence supporting a cardioprotective effect comes from observational epidemiological studies; these studies have reported either weak or nonsignificant associations.  Controlled nutritional prevention trials are scarce and the existing data do not show any clear protective effects of fruit and vegetables on coronary heart disease.  Under rigorously controlled experimental conditions, fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a decrease in blood pressure, which is an important cardiovascular risk factor.  However, the effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on plasma lipid levels, diabetes, and body weight have not yet been thoroughly explored.  Finally, the hypothesis that nutrients in fruit and vegetables have a protective role in reducing the formation of atherosclerotic plaques and preventing complications of atherosclerosis has not been tested in prevention trials.  Evidence that fruit and vegetable consumption reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease remains scarce thus far.

What do they mean by controlled prevention trials?  Here’s an example.  Find 20,000 people with similar characteristics.  Randomly assign half of them to eat significantly more fruits and vegetables, and make sure they do it.  The other half eats their usual way, and make sure they do it.  Analyze the entire group’s health and food consumption after 10 years and see which half has more or less heart disease.   

Such a study is very difficult and costly.  Even if the fruit and veggie group had less heart disease, someone would argue that the heart benefit was gained because of what they cut out of their eating to make way for the fruits and veggies!  “They quit eating Cheetos; that’s why they had fewer heart attacks.”

Bottom Line

Fruits and vegetables don’t prevent heart disease, according to these researchers.

Fruits and vegetables are components of overall healthy diet patterns such as the Mediterranean diet, the DASH diet, and the “prudent diet.”  Is it possible they reduce the risk of stroke, the second leading cause of death?  I’ll leave that for another day.

I’m starting to think if I read enough nutritional literature, I won’t know anything with certainty.

Steve Parker, M.D. 

Dauchet L., Amouyel, P., and Dallongeville, J. (via MedScape).  Fruits, vegetables and coronary heart disease.  Nature Reviews Cardiology, 6 (2009): 599-608.  doi: 1011038/nrcardio.2009.131

11 Comments

Filed under coronary heart disease, Fruits, Vegetables

Tagged as , , ,

April 9, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Prediabetes Ignored Way Too Often

Only half of Americans with prediabetes take steps to avoid progression to diabetes, according to a recent report in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Prediabetes is defined as:

  1. fasting blood sugar between 100 and 125 mg/dl (5.56–6.94 mmol/l) or
  2. blood sugar level 140–199 mg/dl (7.78–11.06 mmol/l) two hours after drinking 75 grams of glucose

Prediabetes is a strong risk factor for development of full-blown diabetes.  It’s also associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease such as heart attack and stroke.  One of every four adults with prediabetes develops diabetes over the next 3 to 5 years.  The progression can often be prevented by lifestyle modifications such as dietary changes, moderate-intensity exercise, and modest weight loss.  

Investigators looked at 1,402 adult participants in the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) who had fasting blood sugar tests and oral glucose tolerance tests diagnostic of  prediabetes.  

The researchers estimate that 30% (almost one out of every three) of the adult U.S. population had prediabetes in 2005-2006, but only 7% of them (less than one in 10) were aware they had it.

Only half of the prediabetics in this survey reported attempts at preventative lifestyle changes in the prior year.  Only one of every three prediabetics reported hearing about risk reduction advice from their healthcare provider.

People, we’ve got to do better! 

My fellow physicians, we’ve got to do better!

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention predicts that one of every three Americans born in 2000 will develop diabetes.  The great majority of this will be type 2 diabetes.  You understand now why James Hirsch, author of Cheating Destiny, calls diabetes America’s leading public health crisis.  I agree.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:  Geiss, Linda S., et al.  Diabetes risk reduction behaviors among U.S. adults with prediabetes.  American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38 (2010): 403-409.

5 Comments

Filed under Causes of Diabetes, coronary heart disease, Overweight and Obesity, Prevention of T2 Diabetes, Stroke, Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , ,

February 27, 2010 · 4:05 AM

Alcohol Habit (Especially Wine) Started in Middle-Age Reduces Heart Attack and Stroke

Jesus turned water into wine at a wedding.  His mother asked him to do it.  Of all the miracles he performed and could have performed, I wonder why this is the first one recorded in the Holy Bible.

We have known for years that low or moderate alcohol consumption tends to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease such as heart attack and stroke, and prolongs life span.  Physicians have been hesitant to suggest that nondrinkers take up the habit.  We don’t want to be responsible for, or even accused of, turning someone into an alcoholic.  We don’t want to be held accountable for someone else’s drunken acts.  Every well-trained physician is quite aware of the ravages of alcohol use and abuse.  We see them up close and personal in our patients.

A scientific study published in 2008, however, lends support to a middle-aged individual’s decision to start consuming moderate amounts of alcohol on a regular basis.  It even provides a positive defense if a doctor recommends it to carefully selected patients.

This research, by the way, was supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, not the wine/alcohol industry.

Methodology

Researchers at the Medical University of South Carolina examined data on 15,637 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study over a 10-year period.  These men and women were 45 to 64 years old at the time of enrollment, living in four communities across the U.S.  Of the participants, 27% were black, 73% nonblack, 28% were smokers, and 80% of them had high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or diabetes.

Out of 15,637 participants at the time of enrollment, 7,359 indicated that they didn’t drink alcohol.  At baseline, these 7,359 had no cardiovascular disease except for some with high blood pressure.    Subsequent interviews with them found that six percent of the nondrinkers – 442 people – decided independently to become moderate alcohol drinkers.  Or at least they identified themselves as such.

“Moderate” intake was defined as 1-14 drinks per week for men, and 1-7 drinks a week for women.  Incidentally, 0.4% of the initial non-drinking cohort – 21 people – became self-identified heavy drinkers.

93.6% of the 7,359 non-drinkers said that they continued to be non-drinkers.  These 6,917 people are the “persistent nondrinkers.”

Type of alcohol consumed was also surveyed and broken down into 1) wine-only drinkers, or 2) mixed drinkers: beer, liquor, wine.

Researchers then monitored health outcomes for an average of 4 years, comparing the “new moderate drinkers” with the “persistent nondrinkers.”

Results

  •  Over 4 years, 6.9% of the new moderate drinkers suffered a cardiovascular event, defined as a heart attack, stroke, a coronary heart disease procedure (e.g, angioplasty), or death from cardiovascular disease.
  • Over 4 years, 10% of the persistent nondrinkers suffered a cardiovascular event.
  • The new moderate drinkers were 38% less likely than persistent nondrinkers to suffer a new cardiovascular event (P = 0.008, which is a very strong association).  The difference persisted even after adjustment for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors.
  • There was no difference in all-cause mortality (death rate) between the new moderate drinkers and the persistent nondrinkers.
  • New  drinkers had modest but statistically significant improvements in HDL and LDL cholesterol and mean blood pressure compared with persistent nondrinkers.
  • 133 new moderate drinkers consumed only wine
  • 234 new moderate drinkers consumed mixed types of alcohol
  • Wine-only drinkers were 68% less likely than nondrinkers to suffer a cardiovascular event.
  • “Consumers of moderate amounts of beer/liquor/mixed (which includes some wine) tended to also be less likely to have had a subsequent cardiovascular event than nondrinkers…but the difference was not significant.”

A Few Study Limitations

  • Four years is a relatively brief follow-up, especially for cancer outcomes.  Alcohol consumption is associated with certain types of cancer.
  • If moderate alcohol consumption indeed lowers death rates as suggested by several other studies, this study may not have lasted long enough to see it.
  • The alcohol data depended on self-reports.

Take-Home Points

The study authors cite four other studies that support a slight advantage to wine over other alcohol types.  It’s a mystery to me why they fail to stress the apparent superiority of wine in the current study.  Several other studies that found improved longevity or cardiovascular outcomes in low-to-moderate drinkers suggest that the type of alcohol does not matter.  Perhaps “the jury is still out.”  In the study at hand, however, it is clear that the reduced cardiovascular disease rate in new moderate drinkers is associated with wine.

In all fairness, other studies show no beneficial health or longevity benefit to alcohol consumption.  But at this point, the majority of published studies support a beneficial effect.

Wine is a component of the traditional healthy Mediterranean diet.  The Mediterranean diet is associated with prolonged life span and reduced cardiovascular disease.  This study strongly suggests that wine is one of the health-promoting components of the Mediterranean diet.

Starting a judicious wine habit in middle age is relatively safe for selected people and may, in fact, improve cardiovascular health, if not longevity.

Now the question is, red or white.  Or grape juice?

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:  King, Dana E., et al.  Adopting Moderate Alchohol Consumption in Middle Age: Subsequent Cardiovascular Events.  American Journal of Medicine, 121 (2008): 201-206.

1 Comment

Filed under Alcohol, coronary heart disease, Mediterranean Diet, Stroke

Tagged as , , , ,

January 18, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Grains and Legumes: Any Effect on Heart Disease and Stroke?

Several scientific studies published in the first five years of this century suggest that whole grain consumption protects agains coronary heart disease and possibly other types of cardiovascular disease, such as stroke. 

Note that researchers in this field, especially outside the U.S., use the term “cereal” to mean “a grass such as wheat, oats, or corn, the starchy grains of which are used as food.”  They also refer frequently to glycemic index and glycemic load, spelled “glycaemic” outside the U.S.  Most of the pertinent studies are observational (aka epidmiologic): groups of people were surveyed on food consumption, then rates of diseases were associated with various food types and amounts.  “Association” is not proof of causation. 

Here are highlights from a 2006 review article in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition: 

The researchers concluded that a relationship between whole grain intake and coronary heart disease is seen with at least a 20% and perhaps a 40% reduction in risk for those who eat whole grain food habitually vs those who eat them rarely.

Whole grain products have strong antioxidant activity and contain phytoestrogens, but there is insufficient evidence to determine whether this is beneficial in coronary heart disease prevention.

Countering the positive evidence for whole grain and legume intake has been the Nurses Health Study in 2000 that showed women who were overweight or obese consuming a high glycaemic load (GL) diet doubled their relative risk of coronary heart disease compared with those consuming a low GL diet.

The intake of high GI carbohydrates (from both grain and non-grain sources) in large amounts is associatied with an increased risk of heart disease in overweight and obese women even when fiber intake is high but this requires further confirmation in normal-weight women.

Promotion of carbohydrate foods should befocused on whole grain cereals because these have proven to be associatied with health benefits.

Whether adding bran to refined carbohydrate foods can improve the situation is also not clear, and it was found that added bran lowered heart disease risk in men by 30%.

Recommendation:  Carbohydrate-rich foods should be whole grain and if theyare not, then the lowest GI product available should be consumed.

My Comments

This journal article focuses on whole grains rather than legumes, and promotes whole grains more than legumes.  For people with diabetes, this may be a bit of a problem since grains—whole or not—generally have a higher glycemic index than legumes, which may have adverse effects on blood sugar control.  Keep in mind that highly refined grain products, like white bread, have a higher glycemic index than whole grain versions.

Did you notice that the abstract doesn’t recommend a specific amount of whole grains for the general population?  My educated guess would be one or two servings a day. 

Grains are high in carbohydrate, so anyone on a low-carb diet may have to cut carbs elsewhere. 

Diabetes predisoses to development of coronary heart disease.  Whole grains seem to help prevent heart disease, yet may adversely affect glucose control, contributing to diabetic complications.  It’s a quandary.  “Caught between the horns of a dilemma,” you might say.  So, what should a diabetic do with this information in 2010, while we await additional research results?

Several options come to mind:

  1. Eat whatever you want and forget about it.
  2. Note whether coronary heart disease runs in your family.  If so, try to incorporate one or two servings of whole grains daily, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar.
  3. Try to eat one or two servings of whole grains a day, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar.  Then decide if it’s worth it.  Is there any effect?  Do you have to increase your diabetic drug dosages or add a new drug?  Are you tolerating the drugs?    
  4. Assess all your risk factors for developing heart disease: smoking, sedentary lifestyle, high blood pressure, age, high LDL cholesterol, family history, etc.  If you have multiple risk factors, see Option #3.  And modify the risk factors under your control.   
  5. Get your personal physician’s advice.    

Before you stress out over this, be aware that we don’t really know whether a diabetic who doesn’t eat grains will have a longer healthier life by starting a daily whole grain habit.  Maybe . . . maybe not.  The study hasn’t been done.    

Steve Parker, M.D.

References:

Flight, I. and Clifton, P.  Cereal grains and legumes in the prevention of coronary heart disease and stroke: a review of the literature.  European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60 (2006): 1,145-1,159.

Malik, V. and Hu, Frank.  Dietary prevention of atherosclerosis: go with whole grains.  American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85 (2007): 1,444-1,445.

4 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, coronary heart disease, Diabetes Complications, Grains, legumes, Stroke

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

January 16, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Eat the Right Carbs to Alleviate Diabetes and Heart Disease

Harvard’s Dr. Frank Hu in 2007 called for a paradigm shift in dietary prevention of heart disease, de-emphasizing the original diet-heart hypothesis and noting instead that “. . . reducing dietary GL [glycemic load] should be made a top public health priority.”  Jim Mann at the University of Otago (Dunedin, New Zealand) authored a 2007 review of carbohydrates and effects on heart disease and diabetes.  Here are highlights from the article summary in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition:

The nature of carbohydrate is of considerable importance when recommending diets intended to reduce the risk of type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease and in the treatment of patients who already have established diseases. Intact fruits, vegetables, legumes and whole grains are the most appropriate sources of carbohydrate. Most are rich in [fiber] and other potentially cardioprotective components.  Many of these foods, especially those that are high in dietary fibre, will reduce total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and help to improve glycaemic control in those with diabetes.

Frequent consumption of low glycaemic index foods has been reported to confer similar benefits, but it is not clear whether such benefits are independent of the dietary fibre content of these foods or the fact that low glycaemic index foods tend to have intact plant cell walls.

A wide range of carbohydrate intake is acceptable, provided the nature of carbohydrate is appropriate. Failure to emphasize the need for carbohydrate to be derived principally from whole grain cereals, fruits, vegetables and legumes may result in increased lipoprotein-mediated risk of cardiovascular disease, especially in overweight and obese individuals who are insulin resistant.

Why does this matter to me and readers of this blog?  Dietary carbohydrates are a major determinant of blood sugar levels, tending to elevate them.  Chronically high blood sugar levels are associated with increased complication rates from diabetes.  People with diabetes are prone to develop heart disease, namely coronary artery disease, which causes heart attacks, weakness of the heart muscle, and premature death. 

Steve Parker, M.D.

References: 

Mann, J.  Dietary carbohydrate: relationship to cardiovascular disease and disorders of carbohydrate metabolism.  European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61 (2007): Supplement 1: S100-11.

Hu, Frank.  Diet and cardiovascular disease prevention: The need for a paradigm shift.  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 50 (2007): 22-24.

4 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, coronary heart disease, Fiber, Fruits, Glycemic Index and Load, Grains, legumes, Vegetables

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

January 8, 2010 · 2:00 AM

What Are Phytonutrients and What Have They Done For Me Lately?

Nutrition scientists think that plants have small amounts of numerous “bioactive compounds,” sometimes referred to as phytonutrients, that protect us against disease.

Many scientific studies have looked at groups of people over time, noting the various foods they eat as well as the diseases they develop.  These are called epidemiologic, ecological, or observational studies.  One finding is that lower rates of heart disease, vascular disease, and cancer are seen in people consuming plant-based diets.  “Plant-based” isn’t necessarily vegetarian or vegan.  The traditional Mediterranean diet, for example, is considered by many to be plant-based because meat, fish, and poultry are not prominent compared to plants. 

In contemplating what source of carbohydrates a person with diabetes should eat, I’ve been reviewing the scientific literature to see which sources of carbs might provide the biggest bang for the buck in terms of health and longevity benefits.

Here are some quotes from a 2002 review article in the American Journal of Medicine:

Phenolic compounds, including their subcategory, flavonoids, are present in all plants and have been studied extensively in cereals, legumes, nuts, olive oil, vegetables, fruits, tea, and red wine. Many phenolic compounds have antioxidant properties, and some studies have demonstrated favorable effects on [blood clotting] and [growth of tumors]. Although some epidemiologic studies have reported protective associations between flavonoids or other phenolics and cardiovascular disease and cancer, other studies have not found these associations.

Hydroxytyrosol, one of many phenolics in olives and olive oil, is a potent antioxidant.

Resveratrol, found in nuts and red wine, has antioxidant, [anti-blood-clotting], and anti-inflammatory properties, and inhibits [malignant tumor onset and growth].

Lycopene, a potent antioxidant carotenoid in tomatoes and other fruits, is thought to protect against prostate and other cancers, and inhibits tumor cell growth in animals.

Organosulfur compounds in garlic and onions, isothiocyanates in cruciferous vegetables, and monoterpenes in citrus fruits, cherries, and herbs have [anti-cancer] actions in experimental models, as well as [heart-healthy effects].

In summary, numerous bioactive compounds appear to have beneficial health effects. Much scientific research needs to be conducted before we can begin to make science-based dietary recommendations. Despite this, there is sufficient evidence to recommend consuming food sources rich in bioactive compounds. From a practical perspective, this translates to recommending a diet rich in a variety of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, oils, and nuts.

The article discusses phytoestrogens—plant chemicals that act in us like the female hormone estrogen—but effects are complex and I suspect we know much more now than we did in 2002 .  Soy products are the most well-known source of phytoestrogens.

The traditional Mediterranean diet is rich in all of the foods mentioned above, except for tea.  Even the Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet includes the aforementioned foods except for tea (I need to add tea and coffee), cereals, and cherries.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:  Kris-Etherton, P.M., et al.  Bioactive compounds in foods: their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer.  American Journal of Medicine, 113 (2002. Supplement 9B): 71S-88S.

Comments Off on What Are Phytonutrients and What Have They Done For Me Lately?

Filed under cancer, coronary heart disease, Fruits, Grains, Health Benefits, legumes, Mediterranean Diet, nuts, olive oil

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , ,

December 18, 2009 · 4:18 PM

Low-Carb Killing Spree Continues

The choice is clear . . . NOT

Low-fat and low-carb diets produce equal weight loss and improvements in insulin resistance but the low-carb diet may be detrimental to vascular health, according to a new study in Diabetes.

Methodology

Researchers in the the UK studied 24 obese subjects—15 female and 9 male—randomized to eat either a low-fat (20% fat, 60% carbohydrate) or low-carb (20% carb, 60% fat) diet over 8 weeks.  Average age was 39; average body mass index was 33.6.  Most of them had prediabetes.  Food intake was calculated to result in a 500 calorie per day energy deficit (a reasonable reduced-calorie diet, in other words).  Study participants visited a nutritionist every other day, and all food was provided in exact weighed portions. 

Results

Both groups lost the same amount of weight, about 7.3% of initial body weight. 

Triglycerides dropped by a third in the low-carb group; unchanged in the low-fat cohort.  Changes in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL changes were about the same for both groups.

Systolic blood pressure dropped about 10 points in both groups; diastolic fell by 5 in both.

“Aortic augmentation index” fell significantly in the low-fat group and tended to rise in the low-carb group.  According to the researchers, the index is used to estimate systemic arterial stiffness.  [In general, flexible arteries are better for you than stiff ones.  “Hardening-of-the-arteries,” etc.]  The low-fat group started with a AAI of 17, the low-carb group started at 12.  They both ended up in the 13-14 range. 

Peripheral insulin sensitivity improved significantly only in the low-carb group but “there was no significant difference between groups.”  No difference between the groups in hepatic (liver) insulin resistance. 

Fasting insulin levels fell about 20% in the low-fat group and about 40% in the low-carb group, a difference not reaching statistical significance (p=0.17).

The Authors’ Conclusions

This study demonstrates comparable effects on insulin resistance of low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets independent of macronutrient content.  The difference in augmentation index may imply a negative effect of low-carbohydrate diets on vascular risk.

My Comments

Yes, you can indeed lose weight over eight weeks on both low-fat and low-carb diets, if you follow them.  So diets DO work.  No surprise.

Loss of excess body fat by either method lowers your blood pressure.  No surprise.

Once again, concerns about low-carb/high-fat diets adversely affecting common blood lipids—increasing heart disease risk—are not supported.  No surprise

Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are risk factors for development of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.  Results here tend to favor the low-carb diet.  I have to wonder if a study with just twice the number of test subjects would have shown a clear superiority for the low-carb diet.

The authors imply that aortic augmentation index is an important measure in terms of future cardiovascular health.  A major conclusion of this study is that a change in this index with the low-carb diet might adveresly affect heart health.  Yet they don’t bother to discuss this test much at all.  I’m no genius, but neither are the typical readers of Diabetes.  I doubt that they are any more familiar with that index than am I, and I’d never heard of it before. 

[Feel free to educate me regarding aortic augmentation index in the comment section.]

Unfortunately, many readers of this journal article and the associated news releases will come away with the impression, once again, that low-carb diets are bad for your heart. 

I’m not convinced.

Steve Parker, M.D.   

References:

Bradley, Una, et al.  Low-fat versus low-carbohydrate weight reduction diets.  Effects on weight loss, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk: A randomized control trial.  Diabetes, 58 (2009): 2,741-2,748.

Nainggolan, Lisa.  Low-carb diets hit the headlines again.  HeartWire, December 11, 2009.

1 Comment

Filed under Carbohydrate, coronary heart disease, Fat in Diet, Prevention of T2 Diabetes, Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,