New Zealand researchers found significant long-term weight loss and improved cholesterol levels over six and 12 months with a low-fat vegetarian diet. Surprisingly, this was accomplished without restriction on calories and without an exercise component. Weight loss measured at six months was 27 lb (12.1 kg) and they only gained a little back over the subsequent six months.
The authors think the successful weight loss was from “… the reduction in the energy density of the food consumed (lower fat, higher water and fibre). Multiple intervention participants stated ‘not being hungry’ was important in enabling adherence.”
I scanned the research report pretty quickly and don’t see that they referred to the diet as vegetarian. Here’s their test diet description:
We chose a low-fat iteration of the plant-based diet [7–15% if calories as fat] as this has been shown with previous research to achieve optimal outcomes, especially for heart disease and weight loss. This dietary approach included whole grains, legumes, vegetables and fruits. Participants were advised to eat until satiation. We placed no restriction on total energy intake. Participants were asked to not count calories. We provided a ‘traffic-light’ diet chart to participants outlining which foods to consume, limit or avoid. We encouraged starches such as potatoes, sweet potato, bread, cereals and pasta to satisfy the appetite. Participants were asked to avoid refined oils (e.g. olive or coconut oil) and animal products (meat, fish, eggs and dairy products). We discouraged high-fat plant foods such as nuts and avocados, and highly processed foods. We encouraged participants to minimise sugar, salt and caffeinated beverages.
Perfect diet compliance would make this a vegan diet. I didn’t catch it in the text of the article, but I’m guessing protein calories were 10–15% of the total, and carbohydrates were around 75%.
The researchers called their investigation the BROAD study. All study subjects were overweight or obese adults. A control group ate their regular foods. The intervention group eating the whole food plant-based diet numbered 33, including 7 with type 2 diabetes. All studies like this have people that drop out. I.e., they quit or otherwise get lost to follow-up. Of the intervention group, 75% lasted for six months, 70% stuck with it for the entire 12 months.
There weren’t enough diabetics in the study to make statistically significant conclusions, but the authors write, “Hemoglobin A1c reductions favoured the intervention and all intervention patients with a diabetes diagnosis improved while adherent, and two resolved their condition by HbA1c.”
I’d love to see these researchers repeat this study with 50–100 overweight or obese folks with T2 diabetes. Clearly, it’s a radically different diet than what I recommend for my patients with diabetes.
Steve Parker, M.D.
PS: For science nerds, here’s the study abstract:
Background/Objective: There is little randomised evidence using a whole food plant-based (WFPB) diet as intervention for elevated body mass index (BMI) or dyslipidaemia. We investigated the effectiveness of a community-based dietary programme. Primary end points: BMI and cholesterol at 6 months (subsequently extended).
Subjects: Ages 35–70, from one general practice in Gisborne, New Zealand. Diagnosed with obesity or overweight and at least one of type 2 diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia. Of 65 subjects randomised (control n=32, intervention n=33), 49 (75.4%) completed the study to 6 months. Twenty-three (70%) intervention participants were followed up at 12 months.
Methods: All participants received normal care. Intervention participants attended facilitated meetings twice-weekly for 12 weeks, and followed a non-energy-restricted WFPB diet with vitamin B12 supplementation.
Results: At 6 months, mean BMI reduction was greater with the WFPB diet compared with normal care (4.4 vs 0.4, difference: 3.9 kg m−2 (95% confidence interval (CI)±1), P<0.0001). Mean cholesterol reduction was greater with the WFPB diet, but the difference was not significant compared with normal care (0.71 vs 0.26, difference: 0.45 mmol l−1 (95% CI±0.54), P=0.1), unless dropouts were excluded (difference: 0.56 mmol l−1 (95% CI±0.54), P=0.05). Twelve-month mean reductions for the WFPB diet group were 4.2 (±0.8) kg m−2 BMI points and 0.55 (±0.54, P=0.05) mmol l−1 total cholesterol. No serious harms were reported.
Conclusions: This programme led to significant improvements in BMI, cholesterol and other risk factors. To the best of our knowledge, this research has achieved greater weight loss at 6 and 12 months than any other trial that does not limit energy intake or mandate regular exercise.
Source: Nutrition & Diabetes – The BROAD study: A randomised controlled trial using a whole food plant-based diet in the community for obesity, ischaemic heart disease or diabetes
11 responses to “How About a Whole Foods Plant-Based Diet?”
From the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
These are the most nutrient dense and low energy foods available
– Bok Choy
– Beetroot greens
– Herbs and spices
Green: Eat Every Day!
– Whole Grains
– Sauces and seasonings (without added oil)
Orange: Use Sparingly, If At All
– Sugar and other sweeteners
– Processed flour
– Tempeh and Tofu
– Soy Milk, Almond Milk, Oat Milk (without added oils)
– Caffeine and alcohol
Red: Set Aside, Do Not Use
– Poultry, Fish, Meat, Eggs
– Dairy Products
Strongly limit due to fat content:
– Nuts and Seeds, Tahini
– Avocado and Coconut,
– Coconut Milk
†Tempeh and Tofu were chosen as orange category foods due to their high fat content. Nuts and seeds were chosen as red category foods mainly due to high fat content. Participants were advised up to 2 tablespoons daily of Flaxseeds or Chia seeds can be consumed, if desired.
Who gives a rat’s ass about cholesterol any more?
Denialist’s don’t care about cholesterol!
“The prime importance of cholesterol in the causation of atherosclerosis is evident due to the fact that there does not appear to be a way to induce lesion formation without dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia is therefore the cause of atherosclerosis. There is no other factor that explains lesion development better. There is no more plausible mechanism that has been described. Based on the evidence, this appears to be an incontrovertible fact. High cholesterol loads the gun. So what pulls the trigger? My answer is, if there is no loaded gun, there is no trigger to worry about.”
Brown and Goldstein: The Cholesterol Chronicles
History of Discovery: The LDL Receptor
Joseph L. Goldstein and Michael S. Brown
A RECEPTOR-MEDIATED PATHWAY FOR CHOLESTEROL HOMEOSTASIS
Nobel lecture, 9 December, 1985
MICHAEL S. BROWN AND JOSEPH L. GOLDSTEIN
If they’d been right, heart disease would have been resolved by now …
Dont’ bother he will start quoting plant positive.
ha ha http://thelowcarbdiabetic.blogspot.com/2014/04/charles-grashow-wins-golden-gezza.html
My concern with this diet (long-term) would be that there is very little protein intake.
I feel like we’ve seen this movie before. I think it would be unsustainable in the long run due to lack of not only protein, but animal protein. I also question the choice of using bread for diabetics. Sure, eat plenty of vegetables, but add a bit of fat and eat some meat as well.
So you resort to insults where science fails.
Understand this – I’m NOT a vegan/vegetarian. I consume full fat raw goat milk, goat milk kefir, small amounts of animal protein and eggs on occasion in addition to everything else that I eat.
However, I appreciate PLantPositive’s videos and the information that they contain.