Category Archives: Weight Loss

October 25, 2010 · 6:56 PM

Another Good Reason to Lose the Fat: Stop Urine Leakage

For overweight and obese women, loss of between five and 10% of body weight significantly reduces urine leakage.  According to the research report in a recent Obstetrics & Gynecology journal, weight loss should be the first approach to urine leakage in overweight and obese women.

The other word for urine leakage is incontinence: an involuntary loss of urine.  It’s a major problem that isn’t much talked about.  It’s not exactly dinner-party conversation material.  You can imagine its effect on quality of life.  In the U.S., leakage of urine on at least a weekly basis is reported by one in 10 women and one in 20 men.  It’s more common at higher ages and in women.  Just looking at non-pregnant women, incontinence affects 7% of women aged 20-39, 17% of those aged 40-59, and 23% of women 60-79 years old.

The study at hand involved 338 overweight and obese women: average age 53 (minimum of 30), average body mass index 36, average weight 92 kg (202 lb).  For participation, they had to have at least 10 incontinence episodes per week.  On average, they reported 24 leakage episodes per week (10 stress incontinence, 14 urge incontinence).  All women were given a “self-help incontinence behavioral booklet with instructions for improving bladder control.”  They were randomized to two different weight-loss programs, but I won’t bore you with the details.  The diets were the standard reduced-calorie type.  One diet group had many more meetings than than the other.

The women kept diaries of leakage, and even collected urine soaked pads for weighing.

Results

Eight-five percent of the women completed the 18-month study.

By six months, 89 of the women has lost five to 10% of body weight; 84 lost over 10%.  As expected, when measured at 18 months, only 61 women were in the “five to 10% loss” category; 71 were in the “over 10%” group. 

Greater amounts of weigh loss were linked to fewer episodes of leakage.  Maximal improvement in leakage episodes were seen in the women who lost between five and 10% of body weight, with no additional benefit to greater degrees of weight loss, generally.

Women who lost 5-10% of their body weight were two to four times more likely to achieve at least a 70% reduction in total and urge incontinent episode frequency compared with women who gained weight at 6, 12, and 18 months.

Weight loss works better for stress incontinence than for urge incontinence.

Three of every four women who lost five to 10% of body weight said they were moderately or very satisfied with their improved bladder control.

Bottom Line

Weight loss is usually not a cure for incontinence, but a reasonable management option for overweight and obese women.  It’s going to take loss of five or 10% of body weight.  Other options  include drugs, surgery, Kegel exercises, and just living with it.

Five or 10% weight loss for a 200 pound woman is just 10 or 20 pounds.  That degree of weight loss is also linked to lower risk of diabetes and hypertension: even more reason go for it.  

Does it work for men?  Who knows?

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Wing, R.R., et al.  Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise: Improving urinary incontinence in overweight and obese women through modest weight loss. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116 (2010): 284-92 PMID: 20664387

2 Comments

Filed under Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , , ,

October 20, 2010 · 4:46 AM

Weight-Loss Drug Meridia Pulled From U.S. Market

MedPageToday reported October 8, 2010, that Abbott is voluntarily removing Meridia from the U.S. market. I had written on October 8 about the higher incidence of stroke and heart attack in Meridia users who had underlying cardiovascular disease.

Meridia, also known as sibutramine, has an estimated 100,000 users in the U.S. Abbott recommends that they stop taking the drug and consult their physicians about other weight-loss programs.

Here are a some options I like:

  1. Advanced Mediterranean Diet
  2. Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet
  3. Low-Carb Mediterranean Diet

This would be a good time for Meridia ex-users to review “Prepare For Weight Loss.”

Steve Parker, M.D.

Comments Off on Weight-Loss Drug Meridia Pulled From U.S. Market

Filed under Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , ,

October 8, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Heart and Stroke Patients: Avoid Weight-Loss Drug Sibutramine (Meridia)

The weight-loss drug sibutramine (Meridia) should be withdrawn from the U.S. market, suggests an editorialist in the September 2, 2010, New England Journal of Medicine.  Based on a clinical study in the same issue, it’s more accurate to conclude that sibutramine shouldn’t be prescribed for people who aren’t supposed to be taking it in the first place.

Sibutramine is sold in the U.S. as Meridia and has been available since 1997.  Judging from the patients I run across, it’s not a very popular drug.  Why not?  It’s expensive and most people don’t lose much weight.

The recent multi-continent SCOUT trial enrolled 9,800 male and female study subjects at least 55 years old (average age 63) who had either:

  1. 1) History of cardiovascular disease (here defined as coronary artery disease, stroke, or peripheral artery disease)
  2. 2) Type 2 diabetes plus one or more of the following: high blood pressure, adverse cholesterol levels, current smoking, or diabetic kidney disease.
  3. Or both of the above (which ended up being 60% of the study population)`.

Here’s a problem from the get-go (“git-go” if you’re from southern U.S.).  For years, Meridia’s manufacturer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have told doctors they shouldn’t use the drug in patients with history of cardiovascular disease.  It’s not the scary “black box warning,” but it’s clearly in the package insert of full prescribing information.

Half the subjects were randomized to sibutramine 10 mg/day and the other half to placebo.  All were instructed in diet and exercise aiming for a 600 calorie per day energy deficit.  They should lose about a pound a week if they followed the program.  Average follow-up was 3.4 years.

What Did the Researchers Find?

Forty percent of both drug and placebo users dropped out of the study, a very high rate.

As measured at one year, the sibutramine-users averaged a weight loss of 9.5 pounds (4.3 kg), the majority of which was in the first 6 weeks.  After the first year, they tended to regain a little weight, but kept most of it off.

Death rates were the same for sibutramine and placebo.

Sibutramine users with a history of cardiovascular disease had a 16% increase in non-fatal heart attack and stroke compared to placebo.  To “cause” one heart attack or stroke in a person with known cardiovascular disease, you would have to treat 52 such patients.

Folks in the “diabetes plus risk factor(s)” group who took sibutramine had no increased risk of heart attack or stroke.

So What?

Average weight loss with sibutramine isn’t much.  Nothing new there.  [Your mileage may vary.]

People with cardiovascular disease shouldn’t take sibutramine.  Nothing new there either.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:  James, W. Philip, et al.  Effect of sibutramine on cardiovascular outcomes in overweight and obese subjects.  New England Journal of Medicine, 363 (2010): 905-917.

Comments Off on Heart and Stroke Patients: Avoid Weight-Loss Drug Sibutramine (Meridia)

Filed under coronary heart disease, Drugs for Diabetes, Overweight and Obesity, Stroke, Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

August 23, 2010 · 5:22 AM

2002 Atkins Diet at a Glance

Dr. Robert C. Atkins is the modern popularizer of low-carb dieting.  He was neither the first nor only low-carb advocate of the 20th century, but certainly the most influential in modern history in terms of followers.  His Dr. Atkins Diet Revolution was published in 1972 and sold millions of copies. 

Sir Isaac Newton wrote in 1676: “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.”  Twentieth century giants for Dr. Atkins include Frank Evans, Blake Donaldson (the original paleo diet guru?), Per Hansen, Alfred Pennington, and John Yudkin.  Most of these were physicians, by the way.  William Banting preceeded them, in the 19th century.

Dr. Atkins New Diet Revolution, published in 2002, was a huge seller then and maintains a respectable sales volume even now.  My impression is that Atkins Nutritionals, Inc., has replaced it with The New Atkins for a New You, which I reviewed last spring.  Enough people still follow DANDR that I need to stay familiar with it.  Here’s my brief summary of the phases.

Induction or Phase 1

  • Limit carbs to 20 g of “net carbs” daily for a minimum of two weeks.
  • “Net carbs” is the total carb count in grams, minus the fiber grams.
  • 3 cups of salad greens daily with olive oil/vingar or lemon juice OR 2 cups of salad greens and one cup of non-starchy cooked vegetables (e.g., broccoli or zucchini).
  • May also eat 3–4 ounces of aged cheese, a handful of olives, and half an avocado daily.

Ongoing Weight Loss (OWL) or Phase 2

  • Deliberate slowing of weight loss.
  • Gradually add back nutrient-rich carbs.
  • Increase net carbs weekly by just 5 g, by eating more veggies, nuts, seeds, even berries (this is where the “carb ladder” comes into play, adding carb groups in a specific order).
  • Some dieters can even add small amounts of beans and fruits other than berries, until weight loss stalls.  At that point, you drop back 5 g net carbs, to your Critical Carbohydrate Level for Losing (CCLL).

Pre-maintenance or Phase 3

  • Begins 5 or 10 pounds before reaching your weight goal.
  • Weight loss slows even more, taking at least 2 months to lose that last 10 pounds.
  • Can now add some starchy veggies like sweet potatoes, peas, whole grains.
  • If weight loss stops before goal, drop back down by 5-10 g net carbs, to your revised CCLL.

Lifetime Maintenance or Phase 4

  • Starts when you’ve been at goal weight for one month.
  • No more junk food, ever.
  • Stay vigilant for excessive carbs.  You may never be able to go back to whole grains or higher-carb fruits and vegetables.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: Gary Taubes reviews the history of low-carb diets in his masterpiece, Good Calories, Bad Calories.

Sir Isaac Newton
Head and shoulders portrait of man in black with shoulder-length gray hair, a large sharp nose, and an abstracted gaze

Comments Off on 2002 Atkins Diet at a Glance

Filed under Book Reviews, Carbohydrate, Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 13, 2010 · 8:16 AM

Is a Low-Carb Diet Safe For Obese Adolescents?

High-protein, low-carbohydrate diets are safe and effective for severely obese adolescent, according to University of Colorado researchers.

Childhood obesity in the U.S. tripled from the early 1980s to 2000, ending with a 17% obesity rate.  Overweight and obesity together describe 32% of U.S. children.  Some experts believe this generation of kids will be the first in U.S. history to suffer a decline in life expectancy, related to obesity.

Colorado researchers wondered if a low-carb, high-protein diet is a reasonable treatment option.  Why high protein?  It’s an effort to preserve lean body mass (e.g., muscle). 

ResearchBlogging.orgThey randomized 46 adoloscents (age 12–18) to either a high-protein, low-carb diet (HPLC diet) or a calorie-restricted low-fat diet to be followed for 13 weeks.  HPLC dieters could eat unlimited calories as long as they attempted to keep carb consumption to 20 g/day or less.  Low-fat dieters were to choose lean protein sources, aiming daily for 2 to 2.5 grams of protein per kilogram of ideal body weight.  Study participants underwent blood analysis and body compositon analysis by dual x-ray absorptiometry.  These kids weighed an average of 108 kg (238 lb) and average body mass index was 39. 

Analysis of food diaries showed the following:

  • Average caloric intake was 1300-1450/day, toward the lower end for the HPLC dieters
  • Energy composition of the HPLC diet: 32% from protien, 11% from carb, 57% from fat
  • Energy compositon of the LF diet: 21% from protein, 51% from carb, 29% from fat
  • Average daily carb consumption for the HPLCers ended up closer to 40 g (still very low) 

Findings

Both groups lost weight, with the HPLC dieters trending to greater weight loss, but not to a statistically significant degree.  They did, however, show a greater drop in body mass index Z-score, however.  Study authors didn’t bother to explain “body mass index Z-scores,” assuming I would know what that meant.  Average weight in the HPLC group dropped 13 kg (29 lb) compared to 7 kg (15 lb) in the low-fat group.

Total and LDL cholesterol fell in both groups, and insulin resistance improved.  Neither diet had much effect on HDL cholesterol.

As usual, triglycerides fell dramatically in the HPLC dieters.

Nearly 40% of the kids—about the same number in both groups—dropped out before finishing the 13 weeks.

The HPLC group did not see any particular preservation of lean body mass, and actually seemed to lose a bit more than the low-fat group.

There were no serious adverse effects in either group. 

Surprisingly, satiety and hunger scores were the same in both groups.  [Low-carb, ketogenic diets have a reputation for satiation and hunger suppression.]

My Comments

This is a small short-term study with a large drop-out rate; we must consider it a pilot study.  That’s why I’m not as enthusiastic about it as the researchers.  Nevertheless, it does indeed suggest that high-protein, low-carb diets are indeed safe and effective in obese adolescents.  It’s a start.   

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Krebs, N., Gao, D., Gralla, J., Collins, J., & Johnson, S. (2010). Efficacy and Safety of a High Protein, Low Carbohydrate Diet for Weight Loss in Severely Obese Adolescents The Journal of Pediatrics, 157 (2), 252-258 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.010

19 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, Fat in Diet, ketogenic diet, Protein, Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

August 7, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Low-Fat and Low-Carb Diets End Battle in Tie After Two Years, But…

Dieters on low-fat and low-carb diets both lost the same amount of weight after two years, according to a just-published article in Annals of Internal Medicine.  Both groups received intensive behavioral treatment, which may be the key to success for many.  Low-carb eating was clearly superior in terms of increased HDL cholesterol, which may help prevent heart disease and stroke.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and was carried out in Denver, St. Louis, and Philadelphia.

How Was It Done?

Healthy adults aged 18-65 were randomly assigned to either a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet.  Average age was 45.  Average body mass index was 36 (over 25 is overweight; over 30 is obese).  Of the 307 participants, two thirds were women.  People over 136 kg (299 lb) were excluded from the study—I guess because weight-loss through dieting is rarely successful at higher weights.  Diabetics were excluded. 

The low-carb diet:  Essentially the Atkins diet with a prolonged induction phase (12 weeks instead of two).  Started with maximum of 20 g carbs daily, as low-carb vegetables.  Increase carbs by 5 g per week thereafter as long as weight loss progressed as planned.  Fat and protein consumption were unlimited.  The primary behavioral goal was to limit carb consumption.

The low-fat diet:  Calories were limited to 1200-1500 /day (women) or 1500-1800 (men).  [Those levels in general are too low, in my opinion.]  Diet was to consist of about 55% of calories from carbs, 30% from fat, 15% from protein.  The primary behavioral goal was to limit overall energy (calorie) intake. 

Both groups received frequent, intensive in-person group therapy—lead by dietitians and psychologists—periodically over two years, covering such topics as self-monitoring, weight-loss tips, management of weight regain and noncompliance with assigned diet.  Regular walking was recommended.

Body composition was measured periodically with dual X-ray absorptiometry.

What Did They Find?

Both groups lost about 11% of initial body weight, but tended to regain so that after two years, both groups average losses were only 7% of initial weight.  Weight loss looked a little better at three months in the low-carb group, but it wasn’t statistically significant. 

The groups had no differences in bone density or body composition.

No serious cardiovascular illnesses were reported by participants.  During the first six months, the low-carb group reported more bad breath, hair loss, dry mouth, and constipation.  After six months, constipation in the low-carb group was the only symptom difference between the groups.

During the first six months, the low-fat group had greater decreases in LDL cholesterol (with potentially less risk of heart disease), but the difference did not persist for one or two years.

Increases in HDL cholesterol (potentially heart-healthy) persisted throughout the study for the low-carb group.  The increase was 20% above baseline.

About a third of participants in both groups dropped out of the study before the two years were up.  [Not unusual.]

My Comments

Contrary to several previous studies that suggested low-carb diets are more successful than low-fat, the study at hand indicates they are equivalent as long as dieters get intensive long-term group behavioral intervention. 

Low-carb critics warn that the diet will cause osteoporosis, a dangerous thinning of the bones that predisposes to fractures.  This study disproves that.

Contrary to widespread criticism that low-carb eating—with lots of fat and cholestrol— is bad for your heart, this study notes a sustained elevation in HDL cholesterol (“good cholesterol”) on the low-carb diet over two years.  This also suggests the low-carbers  followed the diet fairly well.  The investigators also note that low-carb eating tends to produce light, fluffy LDL cholesterol, which is felt to be less injurious to arteries compared to small, dense LDL cholesterol.

A major strength of the study is that it lasted two years, which is rare for weight-loss diet research.

A major weakness is that the investigators apparently didn’t do anything to document the participants’ degree of compliance with the assigned diet.  It’s well known that many people in this setting can follow a diet pretty well for two to four months.  After that, adherence typically drops off as people go back to their old habits.  The group therapy sessions probably improved compliance, but we don’t know since it wasn’t documented. 

How often do we hear “Diets don’t work.”  Well, that’s just wrong.

Overall, it’s an impressive study, and done well. 

Individuals wishing to lose weight on their own can’t replicate these study conditions because of the in-person behavioral intervention component.  There are lots of self-help calorie-restricted balanced diets (e.g., Sonoma Diet, The Zone,  Advanced Mediterranean Diet) and low-carb diets (e.g., Atkins Diet, Banting’s Letter on Corpulence, Low-Carb Mediterranean or Ketogenic Mediterranean Diets).  On-line support groups—e.g. Low Carb Friends and SparkPeople and 3 Fat Chicks on a Diet—could supply some necessary behavioral intervention strategies and support.  

Choosing a weight-loss program is not as easy as many think.  [Well, I’ll admit that choosing the wrong one is easy.]  I review the pertinent issues in my “Prepare for Weight Loss” page.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Foster, Gary, et al.  Weight and metabolic outcomes after 2 years on a low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diet: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153 (2010): 147-157   PMID: 20679559

8 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, Fat in Diet, ketogenic diet, Overweight and Obesity, Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

July 29, 2010 · 7:45 PM

Drew Carey Succeeds With Very Low-Carb Diet

Jimmy Moore today at Livin’ La Vida Low Carb reports on Drew Carey’s fantastic success in losing 80 pounds (36.4 kg) of fat and controlling (curing?) his type 2 diabetes.  Jimmy says many Hollywood celebrities control their weight with carbohydrate-restricted eating.

Steve Parker, M.D.

2 Comments

Filed under Weight Loss

Tagged as ,

July 2, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Basic Science: Mediterranean Diet Boosts Antioxidant Power

Compared to the low-fat American Heart Association diet, the traditional Mediterranean diet rich in olive oil has more capacity to counteract potentially harmful “free radicals” and “reactive oxygen species” in our bodies, according to researchers at the University of Navarra in Spain.

Our tissues normally contain free radicals and reactive oxygen species, which are intrinsic to cell metabolism.  They serve useful purposes.  In excessive amounts, however, many believe they cause “oxidative damage” and thereby contribute to chronic degenerative conditions such as atherosclerosis, aging, dementia, and cancer.

Antioxidants are thought to neutralize free radicals and reactive oxygen species, which may lead to better health.

The PREDIMED study is an ongoing Spanish project testing the heart-protective effects of the Mediterranean diet in high-risk people over the course of four years.  The three intervention groups are 1) Medi diet plus supplemental virgin olive oil, 2) Medi diet plus extra tree nuts, and 3) low-fat American Heart Association diet.

After three years of follow-up, the researchers measured “total antioxidant capacity” in the bloodstream of a subset of the PREDIMED participants.

They found that the two Mediterranean diet groups had significantly greater total antioxidant capacity, about 50% more than the low-fat control group.  Within the Medi + olive oil group, the participants with the highest levels of antioxidant capacity actually tended to lose weight, an association not seen in the other groups.

The Researchers’ Conclusions

Mediterranean diet, especially rich in virgin olive oil, is associatied with higher levels of plasma antioxidant capactiy.  Plasma total antioxidant capacity is related to a reduction in body weight after three years of intervention in a high cardiovascular risk population with a Mediterranean-style diet rich in virgin olive oil.

In other words, the Mediterranean diet with virgin olive oil may help you keep your weight under control, and the antioxidant capacity may contribute to the well-documented health benefits of the diet.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS:  It’s impossible to tell from this report just how much weight loss was seen in the high-TAC Medi+olive oil subjects.  I doubt it was much.  Baseline body mass index for all participants was around 29, so they were overweight and just a shade under obese.

PPS:  Both the Ketogenic Mediterranean and Diabetic Mediterranean Diets mandate minimal amounts of olive oil consumption, with no upper limit.

Reference: Razquin, C., et al. A 3 year follow-up of a Mediterranean diet rich in virgin olive oil is associated with high plasma antioxidant capacity and reduced body weight gain.  European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 63 (2009): 1,387-1,393.  doi 10.1038/ejcn.2009.106

4 Comments

Filed under Fat in Diet, Health Benefits, Mediterranean Diet, Weight Loss

Tagged as , , , , , ,

June 22, 2010 · 9:01 AM

Nutritional Analysis of William Banting’s 1865 Diet

I recently blogged about London’s low-carb diet fad of 1865, originated by William Banting.  He’s often credited with popularizing the first “modern” low-carb diet.  Gary Taubes wrote about it in his Good Calories, Bad Calories book.  A participant at Active Low-Carber Forums took the time to analyze Banting’s diet.

At 100 g of carbs, Banting’s diet had about a third as much as today’s usual U.S. diet.

From elisaannh at Active Low-Carber Forums:

I entered Banting’s diet into my nutritional software and it came up to 1925 calories, 101gr carbs, 8gr fiber and 128gr protein, 34gr fat. I used 5.5 oz when he said 5-6 oz, and did add 3 oz brandy for his “tumbler” of grog which he said “if required”. The total oz for his wine and brandy is quite high, at 20! YUM!

I think the diet is a definite improvement over the diet in England at that time period. However, cooked fruit and bread are not necessary, and he doesn’t mention added fat, which I feel his diet is too low in. Perhaps the meat was well marbled, but I did use fish in the calc for his supper at 2 pm (beef and chicken were the other two meats I used to balance it out in the other meals). Prunes were used for the “cooked fruit from a pudding” and apples for his tea time fruit. Green beans were used for his vegetable.

[Reprinted with elisaannh’s permission.]

For screen shots of the calculations: http://picasaweb.google.com/elisaan…feat=directlink

Elisaannh also has a diet blog at http://thelittlebowl.blogspot.com.  Many thanks to Elisaannh, who is a long-haul trucker.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Comments Off on Nutritional Analysis of William Banting’s 1865 Diet

Filed under Weight Loss

Tagged as ,