Tag Archives: Drugs for Diabetes

Introducing Tresiba (insulin degludec): a New Long-Acting Basal Insulin

Tresiba joins other long-acting insulins like insulin glargine (Lantus), insulin detemir (Levemir), and good ol’ NPH insulin. It was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration this year; it’s been used in other countries for longer. Insulin degludec will have different names depending on the country.

Who Is It For?

  • Adults with type 1 and 2 diabetes
  • Not for diabetic ketoacidosis
  • We have no good data on use in children (under 18), pregnant women, and nursing mothers

How Long Does It Work?

It will last for at least 30 hours in most users. After that, effectiveness starts to taper off but some effect may be seen as long as 42 hours after the injection.

What Is Its Role In Treating Diabetes?

Insulin degludec is a basal insulin, meaning that it runs in the background continuously. It’s not designed to reduce blood sugar that rises after a meal. If your pancreas still makes insulin, release of that insulin may reduce after-meal glucose levels adequately. Otherwise, after-meal glucose elevations are addressed with bolus insulin injections. Bolus-type insulins are the rapid-acting ones like Humalog and Novolog.

Most NPH insulin users, and some insulin glargine (Lantus) users, need the injection twice daily. Because of its long duration of action, Triseba users should never need more than one injection daily. I don’t have much experience with Levemir because the hospital where I work doesn’t stock it.

Triseba users should take it at about the same time daily. If you miss that time by up to five or six hours either way, it probably won’t matter.

What’s the Dose?

For type 2 diabetics who have never used insulin, the starting dose is typically 10 units/day.

For type 1’s switching from other insulins, the usual starting dose is one-third to one-half of the total daily insulin dose, plus rapid-acting bolus insulin around meal times for the remainder.

Change the dose no more often than every three or four days.

How Much Does It Cost?

I don’t know. Likely more than some of the other basal insulins.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: Click here for full prescribing information.

PPS: If words like glargine, degludec, and detemir turn your stomach, you’ll appreciate my book.

You'll not find "degludec" in here

You’ll not find “degludec” in here

Comments Off on Introducing Tresiba (insulin degludec): a New Long-Acting Basal Insulin

Filed under Drugs for Diabetes

Are These Two Diabetes Drugs Better Than the Others?

Better living through chemistry

Empagliflozin is a pill. Liraglutide is a once-daily subQ injection.

The two drugs in question are empagliflozin (aka Jardiance) and liraglutide (aka Victoza). Both are used to treat type 2 diabetes, not type 1.

A major problem we have with most diabetes drugs is that while they do lower blood sugars, we don’t have much evidence on whether they actually prolong life and prevent bad outcomes like heart attacks, strokes, cancer, blindness, kidney failure, amputations, and serious infections. It gets even more complicated. For instance, a given drug may eventually be proven to prolong life by a year via prevention of death from heart disease, while at the same time increasing the risk of spending that last year bedridden from a stroke.

It’s extremely difficult and costly to suss out these issues. It requires large clinical trials wherein half of the PWDs (people with diabetes) are treated with a particular drug, and the other half are treated with “standard therapy.” Five or 10 years later you compare clinical endpoints between the two groups. A couple studies have done this recently.

A blogger I follow, Larry Husten, wrote the following:

But it was the secondary goal of these trials that led to the transformation of the field. Baked into the trial design was the provision that if they were able to establish noninferiority then the trial investigators were permitted to test for superiority. The second phase began when Empa-Reg became the first trial to convincingly show a clear benefit, including a reduction in cardiovascular death and a reduction in hospitalization for heart failure. with empagliflozin (Jardiance, Merck). Then, more recently, the LEADER trial showed a significant reduction in cardiovascular events with liraglutide (Victoza, Novo Nordisk). In both trials nearly all the patients had significant established cardiovascular disease—precisely the population that cardiologists are likely to see.

Click the embedded links above for more details. Even better, read the original research reports if you have the time and knowledge. I support my family with a full-time job taking care of patients, so it will be a while (if ever) before I can dig into this further. (When my book sales make me independently wealthy, I’ll have more time for this!)

diabetic diet, low-carb Mediterranean Diet, low-carb, Conquer Diabetes and Prediabetes

Analyzing clinical reports requires a good grasp of logic, statistics, and basic science

Are the LEADER and Empa-Reg trials valid? Yeah, maybe. In an ideal world, other investigators would try to replicate the results with additional clinical trials. Are the published results free of fraud and bias? I don’t know.

Because we don’t know the long-term effects of many of our diabetes drugs, I favor doing as much as possible to control blood sugars with diet, exercise, and weight management.

Stay tuned for future developments.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: Just because one drug in a class of drugs reduces bad clinical outcomes, it doesn’t mean all drugs in the class do.

PPS: If it’s hard for you to pronounce empagliflozin and liraglutide, some of my books don’t even have them.

Comments Off on Are These Two Diabetes Drugs Better Than the Others?

Filed under Drugs for Diabetes

Which Diabetes Drugs Cause Hypoglycemia?

Hypoglycemia—aka low blood sugar—can kill you. The most common cause is medications taken by people with diabetes.


Diabetics not being treated with pills or insulin rarely need to worry about hypoglycemia. That’s usually true also for prediabetics. Yes, some type 2 diabetics control their condition with diet and exercise alone, without drugs.

Similarly, diabetics treated only with diet, metformin, colesevalam, sodium-glucose co-transport 2 inhibitor (SGLT2 inhibitor), and/or an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose, miglitol) should not have much, if any, trouble with hypoglycemia. The DPP4-inhibitors (sitagliptan and saxagliptin) do not seem to cause low glucose levels, whether used alone or combined with metformin or a thiazoladinedione. Thiazolidinediones by themselves cause hypoglycemia in only 1 to 3% of users, but might cause a higher percentage in people on a reduced calorie diet. Bromocriptine may slightly increase the risk of hypoglycemia. GLP-1 analogues rarely cause hypoglycemia, but they can.


Regardless of diet, diabetics are at risk for hypoglycemia if they use any of the following drug classes. Also listed are a few of the individual drugs in some classes:

  • insulins
  • sulfonylureas: glipizide, glyburide, glimiperide, chlorpropamide, acetohexamide, tolbutamide
  • meglitinides: repaglinide, nateglinide
  • pramlintide plus insulin
  • possibly GLP-1 analogues
  • GLP-1 analogues (exanatide, liragultide, albiglutide, dulaglutide) when used with insulin, sufonylureas, or meglitinides
  • possibly thiazolidinediones: pioglitazone, rosiglitazone
  • possibly bromocriptine


If you take drugs for diabetes, you need to be your own pharmaceutical expert. Don’t depend solely on your physician or pharmacist. Your doctor has to be familiar with 150–200 drugs, and the pharmacist, even more. You only need to master two or three, I hope. Here are important things to know about your drugs:

  • interactions with other drugs or supplements you take, whether prescription or over-the-counter
  • how to monitor for drug toxicity (e.g., periodic blood tests)
  • potential adverse effects
  • is the money-saving generic just as good as the brand-name drug
  • what’s the maximum dose and how often can the dose be adjusted
  • if you take a brand-name drug, what’s the generic name

Steve Parker, M.D.

low-carb mediterranean diet

Front cover of book

Comments Off on Which Diabetes Drugs Cause Hypoglycemia?

Filed under Drugs for Diabetes

Does Big Pharma Have Too Much Influence on Diabetes Management?

diabetic mediterranean diet, Steve Parker MD

“For this, I needed six years of college?!”

MedPageToday has a series of articles looking at socioeconomic issues related to diabetes drugs that have come onto the market in the last decade. They call it their Diabetes Drugs Investigation. I recommend the entire series to you if you have type 2 diabetes. The authors’ have five major points:

1. “Diabetes drugs improve lab tests, but not much more, particularly in pre-diabetics.” FDA drug approvals were based mostly on whether hemoglobin A1c or blood sugar levels improved, not on improvements in hard clinical endpoints such as risk of death, heart attacks, stroke, blindness, amputations, etc.

2. “Physicians and drug makers have reported diabetes drugs as the “primary suspect” in thousands of deaths and hospitalizations.”

3. “Diabetes drug makers paid physicians on influential panels millions of dollars.” The implication is that the panelists were not totally unbiased in their assessments of drug effectiveness and safety.

4. “Risk of a risk now equals disease.” This is about the latest redefinition of prediabetes which created many more “patients.” Prediabetes can progress to type 2 diabetes over a number of years: one of every four adults with prediabetes develops diabetes over the next 3 to 5 years. Some doctors are even treating prediabetes with diabetic drugs. (I recommend a “diet and exercise” approach.) The authors think the prediabetic label—one third of U.S. adults, including half of all folks over 65—is over-used and over-treated.

5. “The clinical threshold for diagnosing diabetes has crept lower and lower over the past decade.” For instance, in 1997 expert panels lowered the threshold defining diabetes from a fasting blood glucose level of 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/l) to 125 mg/dl (6.9 mmol/l). Four million more American adults became diabetics overnight. In 2003, they lowered the threshold for prediabetes from a fasting blood glucose from 110 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/l) to 100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/l). Boom! 46 million more American prediabetics.

I fully agree with the authors that we don’t know which drugs for type 2 diabetes are the best in terms of prolonging life, preventing diabetes complications, and postponing heart attacks and strokes. Furthermore, we don’t know all the adverse long-term effects of most of these drugs. For instance, metformin had been on the market for over a decade before we figured out it’s linked to vitamin B12 deficiency. That’s why I try to convince my patients to do as much as they can, when able, with diet and exercise before resorting to one or more drugs. (All type 1 diabetics and a minority of type 2 diabetics must take insulin.) Maybe it’s healthier to focus primarily on drug therapy…but I don’t think so.


Steve Parker, M.D.

low-carb mediterranean diet

Front cover of book

Comments Off on Does Big Pharma Have Too Much Influence on Diabetes Management?

Filed under Drugs for Diabetes

What’s Wrong With Drugs for Diabetes?

paleobetic diet, low-carb diet, diabetic diet

How about this one?

MedPageToday has an article on the “Bittersweet Diabetes Economy” talking about the cost of treating diabetes, Big Pharma influence on diagnosis and treatment of diabetes and prediabetes, and the unknown long-term effectiveness of diabetes drugs. Most of the article pertains to type 2 diabetes. A quote:

Last year, sales of diabetes drugs reached $23 billion [worldwide or U.S.?], according to the data from IMS Health, a drug market research firm. That was more than the combined revenue of the National Football League, Major League Baseball, and the National Basketball Association.

But from 2004 to 2013, none of the 30 new diabetes drugs that came on the market were proven to improve key outcomes, such as reducing heart attacks or strokes, blindness, or other complications of the disease, an investigation by MedPage Today and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel found.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved all of those drugs based on a surrogate endpoint: the ability to lower blood sugar. Many of the new drugs have dubious benefit; some can be harmful.

Another key outcome we don’t know about is prevention or postponement of death via drug therapy for type 2 diabetes.

Now you have some inkling of why I exhort my patients to maximize diet and exercise interventions before resorting to drugs, increasing drug dosages, or adding more drugs. (I’m not talking about type 1 diabetes here.)


Steve Parker, M.D.

low-carb mediterranean diet

Front cover of book

1 Comment

Filed under Drugs for Diabetes

Narrowing Down Your Choice of Diabetes Drugs

Conquer Diabetes and Prediabetes

Metformin is the most-recommended drug for type 2 diabetes

We now have 12 classes of drugs for the treatment of diabetes. How does your doctor choose which ones to use?

It’s easy for type 1 diabetes: insulin. Type 2’s have more options.

Earlier this year I reviewed the American Diabetes Association’s Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2014. A type 2 treatment algorithm therein mentions only six of the 12 classes. This gives you an idea of expert consensus on which drugs to use. The classes are biquanides (metformin), sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and insulins. This is one reason you don’t see much use of bromocriptine and colesevelam.

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists also has a type 2 diabetes treatment algorithm, published in 2013. It also addresses prediabetes and overweight/obesity. You’ll see some of the other classes mentioned. You may find it confusing because of abbreviations.

Believe it or not, most doctors want to do what’s right for our patients. We want positive results that reduce suffering and death. Does Big Pharma influence the production of guidelines and individual physician drug choices? If I had to guess, I’d say yes. But I don’t have the resources to investigate that in any depth. I know without a doubt that if I recommend a drug and the patient has a bad outcome, it helps me win the malpractice lawsuit if I’ve recommended a guideline-approved drug. Other docs know that, and it’s one of many factors that influence drug choice. We also consider cost (if you bring it up), convenience, patient preference, what our local colleagues are doing, what other illnesses the patient has, potential adverse drug effects, etc. Click here for a summary of the various drug classes.

We don’t know the long-term adverse effects of many of these drugs. That’s why I favor doing as much as reasonably possible with lifestyle modification, such as diet and exercise, before stacking up multiple drugs. If you need drugs, and most with diabetes do, lifestyle modification can help you minimize drug use.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: My Conquer Diabetes and Prediabetes book is now available on Kindle and other digital formats.

Comments Off on Narrowing Down Your Choice of Diabetes Drugs

Filed under Drugs for Diabetes

Oral Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: Which Are The Best?

A guideline committee established by the American College of Physicians recently reviewed oral medications for treatment of type 2 diabetes.  Assuming blood sugars were still too high after diet and lifestyle modification, the firmest drug recommendations were:

  • Use metformin first.
  • If blood sugars are still too high, add a second agent to metformin.

This was not nearly as helpful as I’d hoped it would be!

The Problem: Too Many Options

We now have 11 classes of drugs for treatment of 26 million diabetics in the United States.  Clinicians are often at a loss as to which drug(s) to recommend for a particular patient.  For most of these drugs, we know very little about the long-term implications, such as effects on overall death rates, diabetes complications, heart attacks, cancer, and strokes. 

I can think of three diabetes drugs once approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but are now off the market or severely restricted due to serious adverse side effects: phenformin, troglitazone (Rezulin), and rosiglitazone (Avandia).  I fully expect one or more of our current drugs will have a similar fate; only time will tell which ones.

France took pioglitazone off the shelves in 2011 because of a link with bladder cancer.  It’s still available and popular in the U.S.

When you get into multi-drug therapy with two or three different oral drugs, the situation becomes even cloudier.

Some Needles in the Haystack

I reviewed the report from the guideline committee and found just a few clinical pearls to share with you. 

  • They didn’t mention at all the FDA’s recent restrictions on rosiglitazone, so I assume they don’t believe it’s more toxic to the heart than is pioglitazone.
  • Most oral drugs reduce hemoglobin A1c by an average of 1% (absolute decrease).
  • All double-drug regimens were more effective at controlling blood sugars than monotherapy (using only one drug): adding a second drug drops hemoglobin A1c another 1%.
  • “It was difficult to draw conclusions about the comparative effectiveness of type 2 diabetes medications on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and microvascular outcomes because of low quality or insufficient evidence.”  It was so difficult that they didn’t draw any firm conclusions.  In other words, in terms of overall deaths , heart attacks, heart failure, and strokes, it’s hard to favor some of these drugs over others.  However…
  • Compared to sulfonylureas, metformin was linked to a  lower overall death rate and cardiovascular illness (e.g., heart attacks, heart failure, angina).
  • Sulfonylureas and meglitinides tend to cause more hypoglycemia.
  • Thiazolidinediones are linked to a higher risk of heart failure; they shouldn’t be used in patients who already have serious heart failure.
  • Thiazolidinediones may increase the risk of bone fractures.
  • Metformin helps with loss of excess weight, reduces LDL (bad) cholesterol, and lowers triglycerides.
  • Metformin is cheaper than most other diabetes drugs.
  • For double-drug therapy: “No good evidence supports one combination therapy over another, even though some evidence shows that the combination of metformin with another agent generally tends to have better efficacy [better blood sugar control] than any other monotherapy or combination therapy.”

In contrast to these guidelines, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology guidelines of  2009  recommend that  the following should be used earlier and more frequently:  GLP-1 agonists (exenatide) and DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin).  Furthermore, sulfonylureas should have a lower priority than in the past. From my limited perspective here in the Sonoran desert, I have no way of knowing how much influence, if any, Big Pharma had over the AACE guidlelines.

My concern about long-term safety of some these drugs compels me to favor carbohydrate restriction, which reduces the overall need for drugs.  Sure, that’s not true for everybody and it may not last forever.  The more carbs you eat, the more drugs you’re likely to need to keep blood sugars in control in an effort to avoid diabetes complications.

Don’t get me wrong; I’m not anti-drug.  As an internist, I prescribe plenty of drugs every day.  They are a major weapon in my armamentarium.  Regardless of the condition I’m treating, I always try to avoid drugs with unknown and potentially serious long-term consequences.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Qaseem, Amir, et al.  Oral pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of PhysiciansAnnals of Internal Medicine, 156 (2012): 218-231.

Comments Off on Oral Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: Which Are The Best?

Filed under Drugs for Diabetes