Tag Archives: coronary heart disease

April 24, 2010 · 8:21 AM

Whole Grains Reduce Heart Attacks and Strokes

Whole grain consumption is associated with a 21% reduction in cardiovascular disease when compared to minimal whole grain intake, according to a 2008 review article in Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Disease.   

Coronary heart disease is the No. 1 killer in the developed world.  Stroke is No. 3.  The term “cardiovascular disease” lumps together heart attacks, strokes, high blood pressure,  and generalized atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). 

Investigators at Wake Forest University reviewed seven pertinent studies looking at whole grains and cardiovascular disease.  The studies looked at groups of people, determining their baseline food consumption via questionnaire, and noted disease development over time.  These are called “prospective cohort studies.” 

None of these cohorts was composed purely of diabetics.

The people eating greater amounts of whole grain (average of 2.5 servings a day) had 21% lower risk of cardiovascular disease events compared to those who ate an average of 0.2 servings a day.  Disease events included heart disease, strokes, and fatal cardiovascular disease.  The lower risk was similar in degree whether the focus was on heart disease, stroke, or cardiovascular death.

Note that refined grain consumption was not associated with cardiovascular disease events. 

Why does this matter?

The traditional Mediterranean diet is rich in whole grains, which may help explain why the diet is associated with lower rates of cardiovascular disease.  If we look simply at longevity, however, a recent study found no benefit to the cereal grain component of the Mediterranean diet.  Go figure . . . doesn’t add up. 

Readers here know that over the last four months I’ve been reviewing the nutritional science literature that supports the disease-suppression claims for consumption of fruits, vegetables, and legumes.  I’ve been disappointed.  Fruit and vegetable consumption does not lower risk of cancer overall, nor does it prevent heart disease.  I haven’t found any strong evidence that legumes prevent or treat any disease, or have an effect on longevity.  Why all the literature review?  I’ve been deciding which healthy carbohydrates diabetics and prediabetics should add back into their diets after 8–12 weeks of the Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet.

The study at hand is fairly persuasive that whole grain consumption suppresses heart attacks and strokes and cardiovascular death.  [The paleo diet advocates and anti-gluten folks must be disappointed.]  I nominate whole grains as additional healthy carbs, perhaps the healthiest.

But . . .

. . .  for diabetics, there’s a fly in the ointment: the high carbohydrate content of grains often lead to high spikes in blood sugar.  It’s a pity, since diabetics are prone to develop cardiovascular disease and whole grains could counteract that.  We need a prospective cohort study of whole grain consumption in diabetics.  It’ll be done eventually, but I’m not holding my breath.

[Update June 12, 2010: The aforementioned study has been done in white women with type 2 diabetes.  Whole grain and bran consumption do seem to protect them against overall death and cardiovascular death.  The effect is not strong.]

What’s a guy or gal to do with this information now?

Non-diabetics:  Aim to incorporate two or three servings of whole grain daily into your diet if you want to lower your risk of heart disease and stroke. 

Diabetics:  Several options come to mind:

  1. Eat whatever you want and forget about it [not recommended].
  2. Does coronary heart disease runs in your family?  If so, try to incorporate one or two servings of whole grains daily, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar one and two hours after consumption.  Eating whole grains alone will generally spike blood sugars higher than if you eat them with fats and protein.  Review acceptable blood sugar levels here.
  3. Regardless of family history, try to eat one or two servings of whole grains a day, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar.  Then decide if it’s worth it.  Do you have to increase your diabetic drug dosages or add a new drug?  Are you tolerating the drugs?  Can you afford them?    
  4. Assess all your risk factors for developing heart disease: smoking, sedentary lifestyle, high blood pressure, age, high LDL cholesterol, family history, etc.  If you have multiple risk factors, see Option #3.  And modify the risk factors under your control.   
  5. Get your personal physician’s advice.    

Steve Parker, M.D.

Extra Credit:  The study authors suggest a number of reasons—and cite pertinent scientific references—how whole grains might reduce heart disease:

  • improved glucose homeostasis (protection against insulin resistance, less rise in blood sugar after ingestion [compared to refined grains], improved insulin sensitivity or beta-cell function)
  • advantageous blood lipid effects (soluble fiber from whole grains [especially oats] reduces LDL cholesterol, lower amounts of the small LDL particles thought to be particularly damaging to arteries, tendency to raise HDL cholesterol and trigylcerides [seen with insulin resistance in the metabolic syndrome])
  • improved function of the endothelial cells lining the arteries (improved vascular reactivity)

Disclaimer:  All matters regarding your health require supervision by a personal physician or other appropriate health professional familiar with your current health status.  Always consult your personal physician before making any dietary or exercise changes.

Reference: Mellen, P.B, Walsh, T.F., and Herrington, D.M.  Whole grain intake and cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis.  Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease, 18 (2008): 283-290.

14 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, coronary heart disease, Diabetes Complications, Grains, ketogenic diet, legumes, Mediterranean Diet, Stroke

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,

April 10, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Fruits and Vegetables DON’T Prevent Heart Disease

Fruit and vegetable consumption does not seem to reduce the risk of heart attacks (coronary heart disease), according to a recent literature review by French epidemiologists.

I recently wrote about a study that found no overall reduced risk of cancer via consumption of fruits and vegetables.

Heart attacks and cancer are the first and second leading causes of death in the developed world.

So just why, again, are we supposed to be eating our fruits and vegetables?

Here’s most of the abstract written by the epidemiologists:

This Review summarizes the evidence for a relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and the occurrence of coronary heart disease…Most of the evidence supporting a cardioprotective effect comes from observational epidemiological studies; these studies have reported either weak or nonsignificant associations.  Controlled nutritional prevention trials are scarce and the existing data do not show any clear protective effects of fruit and vegetables on coronary heart disease.  Under rigorously controlled experimental conditions, fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a decrease in blood pressure, which is an important cardiovascular risk factor.  However, the effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on plasma lipid levels, diabetes, and body weight have not yet been thoroughly explored.  Finally, the hypothesis that nutrients in fruit and vegetables have a protective role in reducing the formation of atherosclerotic plaques and preventing complications of atherosclerosis has not been tested in prevention trials.  Evidence that fruit and vegetable consumption reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease remains scarce thus far.

What do they mean by controlled prevention trials?  Here’s an example.  Find 20,000 people with similar characteristics.  Randomly assign half of them to eat significantly more fruits and vegetables, and make sure they do it.  The other half eats their usual way, and make sure they do it.  Analyze the entire group’s health and food consumption after 10 years and see which half has more or less heart disease.   

Such a study is very difficult and costly.  Even if the fruit and veggie group had less heart disease, someone would argue that the heart benefit was gained because of what they cut out of their eating to make way for the fruits and veggies!  “They quit eating Cheetos; that’s why they had fewer heart attacks.”

Bottom Line

Fruits and vegetables don’t prevent heart disease, according to these researchers.

Fruits and vegetables are components of overall healthy diet patterns such as the Mediterranean diet, the DASH diet, and the “prudent diet.”  Is it possible they reduce the risk of stroke, the second leading cause of death?  I’ll leave that for another day.

I’m starting to think if I read enough nutritional literature, I won’t know anything with certainty.

Steve Parker, M.D. 

Dauchet L., Amouyel, P., and Dallongeville, J. (via MedScape).  Fruits, vegetables and coronary heart disease.  Nature Reviews Cardiology, 6 (2009): 599-608.  doi: 1011038/nrcardio.2009.131

11 Comments

Filed under coronary heart disease, Fruits, Vegetables

Tagged as , , ,

January 18, 2010 · 2:00 AM

Grains and Legumes: Any Effect on Heart Disease and Stroke?

Several scientific studies published in the first five years of this century suggest that whole grain consumption protects agains coronary heart disease and possibly other types of cardiovascular disease, such as stroke. 

Note that researchers in this field, especially outside the U.S., use the term “cereal” to mean “a grass such as wheat, oats, or corn, the starchy grains of which are used as food.”  They also refer frequently to glycemic index and glycemic load, spelled “glycaemic” outside the U.S.  Most of the pertinent studies are observational (aka epidmiologic): groups of people were surveyed on food consumption, then rates of diseases were associated with various food types and amounts.  “Association” is not proof of causation. 

Here are highlights from a 2006 review article in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition: 

The researchers concluded that a relationship between whole grain intake and coronary heart disease is seen with at least a 20% and perhaps a 40% reduction in risk for those who eat whole grain food habitually vs those who eat them rarely.

Whole grain products have strong antioxidant activity and contain phytoestrogens, but there is insufficient evidence to determine whether this is beneficial in coronary heart disease prevention.

Countering the positive evidence for whole grain and legume intake has been the Nurses Health Study in 2000 that showed women who were overweight or obese consuming a high glycaemic load (GL) diet doubled their relative risk of coronary heart disease compared with those consuming a low GL diet.

The intake of high GI carbohydrates (from both grain and non-grain sources) in large amounts is associatied with an increased risk of heart disease in overweight and obese women even when fiber intake is high but this requires further confirmation in normal-weight women.

Promotion of carbohydrate foods should befocused on whole grain cereals because these have proven to be associatied with health benefits.

Whether adding bran to refined carbohydrate foods can improve the situation is also not clear, and it was found that added bran lowered heart disease risk in men by 30%.

Recommendation:  Carbohydrate-rich foods should be whole grain and if theyare not, then the lowest GI product available should be consumed.

My Comments

This journal article focuses on whole grains rather than legumes, and promotes whole grains more than legumes.  For people with diabetes, this may be a bit of a problem since grains—whole or not—generally have a higher glycemic index than legumes, which may have adverse effects on blood sugar control.  Keep in mind that highly refined grain products, like white bread, have a higher glycemic index than whole grain versions.

Did you notice that the abstract doesn’t recommend a specific amount of whole grains for the general population?  My educated guess would be one or two servings a day. 

Grains are high in carbohydrate, so anyone on a low-carb diet may have to cut carbs elsewhere. 

Diabetes predisoses to development of coronary heart disease.  Whole grains seem to help prevent heart disease, yet may adversely affect glucose control, contributing to diabetic complications.  It’s a quandary.  “Caught between the horns of a dilemma,” you might say.  So, what should a diabetic do with this information in 2010, while we await additional research results?

Several options come to mind:

  1. Eat whatever you want and forget about it.
  2. Note whether coronary heart disease runs in your family.  If so, try to incorporate one or two servings of whole grains daily, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar.
  3. Try to eat one or two servings of whole grains a day, noting and addressing effects on your blood sugar.  Then decide if it’s worth it.  Is there any effect?  Do you have to increase your diabetic drug dosages or add a new drug?  Are you tolerating the drugs?    
  4. Assess all your risk factors for developing heart disease: smoking, sedentary lifestyle, high blood pressure, age, high LDL cholesterol, family history, etc.  If you have multiple risk factors, see Option #3.  And modify the risk factors under your control.   
  5. Get your personal physician’s advice.    

Before you stress out over this, be aware that we don’t really know whether a diabetic who doesn’t eat grains will have a longer healthier life by starting a daily whole grain habit.  Maybe . . . maybe not.  The study hasn’t been done.    

Steve Parker, M.D.

References:

Flight, I. and Clifton, P.  Cereal grains and legumes in the prevention of coronary heart disease and stroke: a review of the literature.  European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60 (2006): 1,145-1,159.

Malik, V. and Hu, Frank.  Dietary prevention of atherosclerosis: go with whole grains.  American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85 (2007): 1,444-1,445.

4 Comments

Filed under Carbohydrate, coronary heart disease, Diabetes Complications, Grains, legumes, Stroke

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

October 28, 2009 · 11:07 AM

Nuts: The Healthy Snack

MPj04031620000[1]Nut consumption is strongly linked to reduced coronary heart disease, with less rigorous evidence for several other health benefits, according to a recent article in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

This is why I’ve included nuts as integral components of the Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet and the Advanced Mediterranean Diet.

Regular nut consumption is associated with health benefits in observational studies of various populations, within which are people eating few nuts and others eating nuts frequently.  Health outcomes of the two groups are compared over time.  Frequent and long-term nut consumption is linked to:

  • reduced coronary heart disease (heart attacks, for example)
  • reduced risk of diabetes in women (in men, who knows?)
  • less gallstone disease in both sexes
  • lower body weight and lower risk of obesity and weight gain 

The heart-protective dose of nuts is three to five 1-ounce servings a week.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:  Sabaté, Joan and Ang, Yen.  Nuts and health outcomes: New epidemiologic evidence.  American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89 (2009): 1,643S-1,648S.

Comments Off on Nuts: The Healthy Snack

Filed under Health Benefits, Mediterranean Diet, Prevention of T2 Diabetes

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

June 11, 2009 · 10:05 AM

Glycemic Index and Chronic Disease Risk (Mostly in Women)

"Would you like some high-glycemic index bread?"

"Would you like some high-glycemic index bread?"

I recently blogged about glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and glycemic diets in preparation for today’s post.

The concept of glycemic index was introduced by Jenkins et al in 1981 at the University of Toronto.

Studies investigating the association between disease risk and GI/GL have been inconsistent.  By “inconsistent,” I mean some studies have made an association in one direction or the other, and other studies have not.  Diseases possibly associated with high-glycemic diets have included diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, gallbladder disease, and eye disease.

“Diet” in this post refers to a habitual way of eating, not a weight loss program.

Researchers with the University of Sydney (Sydney, Australia) identified the best-designed published research reports investigating the relationship between certain chronic diseases and glycemic index and load.  The studied diseases were type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, gallbladder disease, and eye disease.

Methodology

Literature databases were searched for articles published between 1981 and March, 2007.  The researchers found 37 studies that enrolled 1,950,198 participants ranging in age from 24 to 76, with BMI’s averaging 23.5 to 29.  These were human prospective cohort studies with a final outcome being occurrence of a chronic disease (not its risk factors).  Twenty-five of the studies were conducted in the U.S., five in Canada, five Europe, and two in Australia.  Ninety percent of participants were women [for reasons not discussed].  Food frequency questionnaires were used in nearly all the studies.  Individual studies generated between 4 to 20 years of follow-up, and 40,129 new cases of target diseases were identified.

Associations between GI, GL, and risk of developing a chronic disease were measured as rate ratios comparing the highest with the lowest quantiles.  For example, GI and GL were measured in the study population.  The population was then divided into four groups (quartiles), reflecting lowest GI/GL to medium to highest GI/GL diets.  The lowest GI/GL quartile was compared with the highest quartile to see if disease occurrence was different between the groups.  Some studies broke the populations into tertiles, quintiles, deciles, etc.

Findings

Comparing the highest with the lowest quantiles, studies with a high GI or GL independently

  • increased the risk of type 2 diabetes by 27 (GL) or 40% (GI)
  • increased the risk of coronary heart disease by 25% (GI)
  • increased the risk of gallbladder disease by 26% (GI) or 41% (GL) [gallstones and biliary colic, I assume, but the authors don’t specify]
  • increased the risk of breast cancer by 8% (GI)
  • increased risk of all studied diseases (11) combined by 14% (GI) or 9% (GL)

Overall, high GI was more strongly associated with chronic disease than was high GL
So low-GI diets may offer greater protection against disease than low-GL diets.

Comments from the Researchers

They speculate that low-GI diets may be more protective than low-GL because the latter can include low-carb foods such as cheese and meat, and low-GI, high-carb foods.  Both eating styles will reduce glucose levels after meals while having very different effects in other areas such as pancreas beta cell function, free fatty acid levels, triglyceride levels, and effects on satiety.

High GI and high GL diets, independently of known confounders, modestly increase the risk of chronic lifestyle-related diseases, with more pronounced effects for type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, and gallbladder disease.

Direct quotes:

. . . 90% of participants were female; therefore, the findings may not be generalizable to men.

There are plausible mechanism linking the development of certain chronic diseases with high-GI diets.  Specifically, 2 major pathways have been proposed to explain the association with type 2 diabetes risk.  First the same amount of carbohydrate from high-GI food produces higher blood glucose concentrations and a greater demand for insulin.  The chronically increased insulin demand may eventually result in pancreatic beta cell failure, and, as a consequence, impaired glucose tolerance.  Second, there is evidence that high-GI diets may directly increase insulin resistance through their effect on glycemia, free fatty acids, and counter-regulatory hormone secretion.  High glucose and insulin concentrations are associated with increased risk profiles for cardiovascular disease, including decreased concentrations of HDL cholesterol, increased glycosylated protein, oxidative status, hemostatic variables, and poor endothelial function

Low-GI and/or low-GL diets are independently associated with a reduced risk of certain chronic diseases.  In diabetes and heart disease, the protection is comparable with that seen for whole grain and high fiber intakes.  The findings support the hypothesis that higher postprandial glycemia is a universal mechanism for disease progression.

My Comments

Studies like this tend to accentuate the differences in eating styles since they compare the highest with the lowest post-prandial (after meal) glucose levels.  Most people are closer to the middle of the pack, so a person there has potentially less to gain by moving to a low-GI diet.  But still some to gain, on average, particularly in regards to avoiding type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease.

[To be fair, many population-based studies use this same quantile technique.  It increases the odds of finding a statistically significant difference.]

Only two of the 37 studies examined coronary heart disease, the cause of heart attacks.  One study was the massive Nurses’ Health Study database with 75,521 women.  The other was the Zutphen (Netherlands) Elderly Study which examined men 64 and older.  Here’s the primary conclusion of the Zutphen authors verbatim:

Our findings do not support the hypothesis that a high-glycemic index diet unfavorably affects metabolic risk factors or increases risk for CHD [coronary heart disease] in elderly men without a history of diabetes or CHD.

So there’s nothing in the meta-analysis at hand to suggest that high-GI/GL diets promote heart disease in males in the general population.

However, the recent Canadian study in Archives of Internal Medicine found strong evidence linking CHD with high-glycemic index diets.  Although not mentioned in the text of that article, Table 3 on page 664 shows that the association is much stonger in women than in men.  Relative risk for women on a high-glycemic index/load diet was 1.5 (95% confidence interval = 1.29-1.71), and for men the relative risk was 1.06 (95% confidence interval = 0.91-1.20).  See reference below.

Nine of the 37 studies examined the occurrence of type 2 diabetes.  Only one of these studied men only – 42,759 men: the abstract is not available online and the Sydney group does not mention if high-GI or high-GL was positively associated with onset of diabetes in this cohort.  Two of the diabetes studies included both men and women, but the abstracts don’t break down the findings by sex.  [I’m trying to deduce if the major overall findings of this meta-analysis apply to men or not.]

I don’t know anybody willing to change their diet just to avoid the risk of gallstones.  It’s only after they develop symptomatic gallstones that they ask me what they can do about them.  The usual answer is surgery.

The report is well-done and seems free of commercial bias, even though several of the researchers are authors or co-authors of popular books on low-GI eating.

Steve Parker, M.D.

References:

Barclay, Alan W.; Petocz, Peter; McMillan-Price, Joanna; Flood, Victoria M.; Prvan, Tania; Mitchell, Paul; and Brand-Miller, Jennie C.  Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk – a meta-analysis of observational studies [of mostly women].  American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87 (2008): 627-637.

Brand-Miller, Jennie, et al.  “The New Glucose Revolution: The Authoritative Guide to the Glycemic Index – The Dietary Solution for Lifelong Health.”  Da Capo Press, 2006.

Mente, Andrew, et al.  A Systematic Review of the Evidence Supporting a Causal Link Between Dietary Factors and Coronary Heart Disease.  Archives of Internal Medicine, 169 (2009): 659-669.

4 Comments

Filed under Causes of Diabetes, Glycemic Index and Load

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,